No abstract

No abstract

A randomized study to compare the efficacy of combination chemotherapy (cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide: PACe) with chlorambucil (CB) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III and IV ovarian carcinoma was conducted between May 1979 and October 1983. Patients failing initial CB were subsequently eligible for treatment with PACe. Eighty-nine patients were randomized and 85 were eligible for analysis; as of date, 72 of these patients have died. The majority of patients in this study had bulky residual disease after their initial laparotomy (76%). Complete response (CR) was documented by a second laparotomy after five cycles of combination therapy or 6 to 12 months alkylating agent therapy. The overall response rate (CR plus partial response [PR]) for the combination (PACe, 68%) was significantly higher (P = .0004) than that for the chlorambucil (CB, 26%). However, the median survival was not improved (PACe, 13 months; CB, 11 months) and the survival curves were not significantly different (log rank test P = .25). The results of this study are comparable to preliminary data reported from other similar randomized studies. PACe, as administered in this study, is not indicated as routine therapy in patients with bulky residual ovarian carcinoma.

Summary and conclusionsSixty-six untreated patients with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of favourable histological type were allocated alternately to initial treatment with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone or with chlorambucil. The complete remission rate was higher in the group receiving combination chemotherapy, but the overall response rate was the same for both groups. The mean duration of complete remission was the same as that of good partial remission, and was the same for both treatments. The duration of remission was influenced by histological type and extent of disease at presentation, but not age. Those who responded to the initial treatment (whether with complete or with good partial remission) survived significantly longer than did non-responders.It is concluded that neither treatment is satisfactory and that new treatment programmes are needed for patients with a favourable prognosis, especially young patients with extensive disease.

Summary.-One hundred and thirty-nine untreated patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) were admitted between August 1970 and December 1973 and allocated into two remission treatment regimens: one to receive chemotherapy alone and the other chemotherapy with immunotherapy. Of the patients who attained remission, 22 were in the chemotherapy group and in September 1975 2 remained alive, the median survival time being 270 days and after relapse 75 days. Twenty-eight patients received immunotherapy during remission, and 5 remained alive; the median survival time of the group being 510 days and after relapse 165 days. Ongoing actuarial analysis precisely predicted early in the study the median survival of the two groups, but it took a 2-year follow-up after entry of the last patient before it became clear that there were very few long-term survivors. The increase in survival time produced by the immunotherapy is apparently made up of two components: prolongation of the first remission and length of survival after the first relapse. It must be noted that the chemotherapy for this study was devised 6 years ago and the results of the control arm (chemotherapy alone) may be poorer than those obtained in contemporary studies.