Drained and undrained grassland lysimeter plots were established in 1982 on a clay loam of the Hallsworth series at a long-term experimental site in south-west England. The plots were continuously grazed by beef cattle, and received fertilizer at either 200 or 400 kg N ha -I per annum to the existing permanent sward, or at 400 kg N ha-' to a new sward, reseeded to perennial ryegrass following cultivation. Drainage water was monitored at V-notch weirs and sampled daily for the analysis of nitrate-N. Seven years of data are presented (five years for the reseeded swards). On the drained plots a large proportion of the rainfall was routed preferentially down large pores to the mole drains, whilst on the undrained plots, drainage was mainly by surface runoff. The average quantities of nitrate N leached per year were 38.5,133.8 and 55.7 kg ha-' from the old sward that received 200 and 400 kg N ha-', and from the reseed that received 400 kg N ha-' fertilizer, respectively. Ploughing and reseeding resulted in a two-fold reduction in leaching, except during the first winter after ploughing, and twice as much leaching occurred after a hot, dry summer as after a cool, wet one. Nitrate concentrations in drainage from either drained or undrained plots were rather insensitive to rainfall intensity, such that concentration was a good predictor of nitrate load for a given drainage volume. The drainage volume determined the proportion of the leachable N that remained in the soil after the winter drainage period. Initial (peak) concentrations of nitrate N ranged, on average, from 55 mg dm-3 for the drained old sward that received 400 kg N ha-' fertilizer, to 12 mg dm-3 for the undrained sward at 200 kg N ha-' fertilizer input. Concentrations of nitrate N in drainage from similar, unfertilized plots rarely exceeded 1 mg dm-3. The results suggest that manipulating the nitrate supply can lessen leaching and that the route of water through soil to the watercourse determines the maximum nitrate concentration for a given load.
The N2O and N2 fluxes emitted from a temperate UK grassland soil after fertiliser application (equivalent to 25 and 75 kg N ha(-1)) were simultaneously measured, using a new automated soil incubation system, which replaces soil atmosphere (N2 dominated) with a He+O2 mixture. Dual isotope and isotopomer ratios of the emitted N2O were also determined. Total N2O and N2 fluxes were significantly lower (P<0.001) in the control (0 kg N) than in the 25 and 75 kg N treatments. The total N2O flux was significantly higher (P<0.001) in the 75 kg N than in the 25 kg N treatment. The general patterns of N2O and N2 fluxes were similar for both fertiliser treatments. The total gaseous N loss in the control treatment was nearly all N2, whereas in the fertiliser treatment more N2O than N2 was emitted from the soil. The ratio N2O/N2 fluxes as measured during the experiment suggested three phases in N2O production, in phase 1 nitrification>denitrification, in phase 2 denitrification>nitrification, and in phase 3 denitrification (and total denitrification)>>nitrification. Dual delta15N and delta18O isotope and isotopomer (delta15Nalpha and delta15Nbeta) value ratios of emitted N2O also pointed towards an increasing dominance of the production of N2O by denitrification and total denitrification. The site preference value from the soil-emitted N2O was lower than the troposphere value. This confirmed that the enhanced troposphere N2O site preference could result from back injection of N2O from the stratosphere. The measurements of N2O/N2 flux ratio and the isotopic content of emitted N2O pointed, independently, to similar temporal trends in N2O production processes after fertiliser application to grassland soil. This confirmed that both measurements are suitable diagnostic tools to study the N2O production process in soils.
SummaryThe North Wyke Farm Platform was established as a United Kingdom national capability for collaborative research, training and knowledge exchange in agro‐environmental sciences. Its remit is to research agricultural productivity and ecosystem responses to different management practices for beef and sheep production in lowland grasslands. A system based on permanent pasture was implemented on three 21‐ha farmlets to obtain baseline data on hydrology, nutrient cycling and productivity for 2 years. Since then two farmlets have been modified by either (i) planned reseeding with grasses that have been bred for enhanced sugar content or deep‐rooting traits or (ii) sowing grass and legume mixtures to reduce nitrogen fertilizer inputs. The quantities of nutrients that enter, cycle within and leave the farmlets were evaluated with data recorded from sensor technologies coupled with more traditional field study methods. We demonstrate the potential of the farm platform approach with a case study in which we investigate the effects of the weather, field topography and farm management activity on surface runoff and associated pollutant or nutrient loss from soil. We have the opportunity to do a full nutrient cycling analysis, taking account of nutrient transformations in soil, and flows to water and losses to air. The NWFP monitoring system is unique in both scale and scope for a managed land‐based capability that brings together several technologies that allow the effect of temperate grassland farming systems on soil moisture levels, runoff and associated water quality dynamics to be studied in detail.Highlights
Can meat production systems be developed that are productive yet minimize losses to the environment?The data are from an intensively instrumented capability, which is globally unique and topical.We use sensing technologies and surveys to show the effect of pasture renewal on nutrient losses.Platforms provide evidence of the effect of meteorology, topography and farm activity on nutrient loss.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.