The lack of comprehensive data on the bulk density of soil types at the European scale is a serious limitation for pan-European environmental risk assessment studies. Although many predictive methods have been published, most have limitations for application across Europe. We therefore developed a semi-empirical method of prediction using a large UK dataset and tested it and some other methods against a pan-European dataset. Our method indicated that five separate conceptual groupings of the development dataset were valid. Predictive equations based on multiple regression analysis for each of the five groups explained between 40 and 69% of the measured variation in each one. When used to predict measured bulk density from the European dataset, the equations explained 63% of the measured variation in mineral horizons from soil environments similar to those of the development dataset with a predictive mean percentage error of ±11%. The equation for organic horizons explained 29% of the measured variation in bulk density with a mean percentage error of ±39%. For those horizons from soil environments outside those of the development dataset, prediction of bulk density was relatively poor, even when using soil region-specific PTFs derived from its data. It was concluded that, for these soils, factors other than organic carbon, particle size, horizon depth, mechanical cultivation or parent material have a major influence on bulk density and need further investigation.

No abstract

The extent to which a fast, nonequilibrium, and highly transient pore‐scale process such as macropore flow can be predicted is very often debated, although little research has been conducted to investigate this issue. The validity of approaches to “upscaling” transport predictions from pore through Darcy to landscape scales critically depends on the answer to this question. We developed a simple conceptual model of soil susceptibility to macropore flow, based on a synthesis of existing experimental information. The conceptual model takes the form of a decision tree, which classifies soil horizons into one of four susceptibility classes on the basis of easily available site and soil factors. The model was tested against an independent database of tracer breakthrough experiments on undisturbed soil columns collated from the literature (n = 52), using the pore volumes drained at peak solute concentration, tp, as a measure of the strength of macropore flow. Analysis of variance for tp as a function of susceptibility class showed that the overall model was significant. A significant proportion of the residual variation in tp could be attributed to variation in clay content within one of the susceptibility classes. Some important sources of experimental error were also identified that may account for much of the remaining unexplained variation. We concluded that macropore flow is predictable to a sufficient degree from easily available soil properties and site factors. The simple classification tree developed in this study could be used to support hydropedological approaches to quantifying the spatial distribution of contaminant leaching at the landscape scale by providing the basis for class pedotransfer functions to estimate model parameters related to macropore flow. Such an approach has been implemented in the European project FOOTPRINT.

During the autumn of 2000, England and Wales experienced the wettest conditions for over 270 years, causing significant flooding. The exceptional combination of a wet spring and autumn provided the potential for soil structural degradation. Soils prone to structural degradation under five common lowland cropping systems (autumn-sown crops, late-harvested crops, field vegetables, orchards and sheep fattening and livestock rearing systems) were examined within four catchments that experienced serious flooding. Soil structural degradation of the soil surface, within the topsoil or at the topsoil/subsoil junction, was widespread in all five cropping systems, under a wide range of soil types and in all four catchments. Extrapolation to the catchment scale suggests that soil structural degradation may have occurred on approximately 40% of the Severn, 3035 % of the Yorkshire Ouse and Uck catchments and 20% of the Bourne catchment. Soil structural conditions were linked via hydrological soil group, soil condition and antecedent rainfall conditions to SCS Curve Numbers to evaluate the volume of enhanced runoff in each catchment. Such a response at the catchment-scale is only likely during years when prolonged wet weather and the timing of cultivation practices lead to widespread soil structural degradation. Nevertheless, an holistic catchment-wide approach to managing the interactions between agricultural land use and hydrology, allowing appropriate runoff (and consequent flooding) to be controlled at source, rather than within the floodplain or the river channel, should be highlighted in catchment flood management plans.

No abstract