Background. Frailty has emerged as one of the main predictors of worse outcomes after cardiac surgery, but scarce evidence is available about its influence on postoperative quality of life. Whether frail patients may improve their quality of life or not after the surgical procedure is a matter that still remains unclear.Methods. This observational and multicenter cohort study was conducted in 3 university-affiliated hospitals of three different regions of Spain (Madrid, Asturias, and Canary Islands). Patients were categorized into three ordinal levels of frailty (frail, prefrail, robust) using the Fried, FRAIL (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight) scale, and Clinical Frailty Scale frailty scales. We analyzed the changes on health-related quality-of-life for each level of frailty using the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5 Level questionnaire before and 6 months after the operation.Results. The study included 137 patients, and 109 completed the 6-month follow-up.

The purpose of the study is to present our experience and compare the results of the three types of ports used as a central venous access and performed in the radiology suite. Between March 1989 and November 1993 we performed 288 implantations (100 Implantofix Seldinger, 100 plastic Hickman port, and 88 stainless steel Port-a-cath) for chemotherapeutic treatment on the same number of patients diagnosed as having cancer. In all cases access was obtained via a subclavian vein (the left one in 185 cases and the right one in 103). All the system ports were implanted in the radiology suite. In all cases the procedure was successfully performed. Complications occurred in 26.3% of cases, most notably thrombosis in 13 cases (4.5%) and infection in 12 cases (4.1%). Duration of the port systems placement varied between 17 and 1467 days (a mean of 315 days). A total of 133 systems have been removed to date, 80 (60.%) due to termination of chemotherapy, and 53(40%) for treatment of complications. Significant differences (complications and port duration time) were not observed between the three types of reservoir used. Subcutaneous ports are safe, comfortable, and effective devices for central venous access.

The purpose of this study was to assess whether regular instillation of urokinase during abscess drainage leads to an improved outcome compared to saline irrigation alone. One hundred patients referred for image-guided abdominal abscess drainage were randomized between thrice daily urokinase instillation or saline irrigation alone. At the end of the study, patient medical records were reviewed to determine drainage, study group, Altona (PIA II) and Mannheim (MPI) scoring, duration of drainage, procedure-related complications, hospital stay duration, and clinical outcome. The technical success rate of the percutaneous abscess drainage was 100%. The success or failure of abscess remission did not differ significantly between groups (success rate of 91.5% in the urokinase group vs. 88.8% in the saline group; failure rate was of 8.5 vs. 21.2%, respectively); however, days of drainage, main hospital stay, and overall costs were significantly reduced in patients treated with urokinase compared to the control group (P < 0.05). No adverse effects from urokinase were observed. Surgical scores were a useful homogeneity factor, and MPI showed a good correlation with prognosis, while PIA results did not have a significant correlation. For drainage of complex abscesses (loculations, hemorrhage, viscous material), fibrinolytics safely accelerate drainage and recovery, reducing the length of the hospital stay and, therefore, the total cost.

No abstract

No abstract