Materials representing common interstratified clay minerals are shown to be composed of aggregates of fundamental particles. Transmission electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction demonstrate that the x-ray diffraction characteristics of a wide range of interstratification can be modeled experimentally by utilizing materials containing only three types of particles. The data have been incorporated into a new model that regards interstratified clay minerals as populations of fundamental particles whose x-ray diffraction patterns result from interparticle diffraction.
Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) examination of the <0.1-/zm fraction of montmorillonite and regularly interstratified illite-smectite (I-S) shows that these clays, when dried from suspension, consist primarily of particles 10 A and 20 A thick respectively. However, X-ray diffraction (XRD) examination of sedimented aggregates of montmorillonite indicate that the effective number of unit cells that are diffracting coherently is ~9. This discrepancy can be reconciled by postulating an interparficle diffraction effect from the sedimented aggregates of oriented particles. The interfaces of these particles are capable of adsorbing water, ethylene glycol etc. so that on this basis smectite is composed of elementary silicate particles 10 A thick, and regularly interstratified I-S is primarily composed of elementary 'illite' particles 20 A thick, values which are in agreement with the TEM observations. This concept is confirmed experimentally by XRD examination of sedimented aggregates from mixed suspensions of both materials; the resulting patterns are identical to those of randomly interstratified illite and smectite layers, which indicates that the layer sequence examined by XRD has been entirely rearranged. It is concluded that the use of XRD peak breadth to determine mean crystal thickness cannot be reliably applied to these systems. Standard XRD data from sedimented aggregates may not be able to distinguish between true interstratification and interparticle diffraction effects of intimate physical mixtures.
Diagenetic illitic clays from seven North American bentonites of Ordovician, Devonian, and Cretaceous ages and from three subsurface North Sea sandstones of Permian and Jurassic ages have been examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM and SEM). XRD indicates that the clays from the bentonites are randomly and regularly interstratified illite/smectites (I/S) with 30–90% illite layers, whereas the clays from the Jurassic and Permian sandstones are regularly interstratified I/S, with 80–90% illite layers, and illite respectively. TEM of shadowed materials shows that randomly interstratified I/S consists primarily of mixtures of elementary smectite and ‘illite’ particles (10 and 20Å thick respectively) and that regularly interstratified I/S and illite consist mainly of ‘illite’ particles 20–50 Å thick and > 50 Å thick respectively. Regularly interstratified I/S from bentonites and sandstones are similar with regard to XRD character and particle thickness distribution. These observations can be rationalized if the interstratified XRD character arises from an interparticle diffraction effect, where the smectite interlayers perceived by XRD, result from adsorption of exchangeable cations and water or organic molecules at the interfaces of particles generally < 50Å thick. A neoformation mechanism is proposed by which smectite is converted to illite with increasing depth of burial in sedimentary rocks, based on dissolution of smectite particles and the precipitation/growth of ‘illite’ particles occurring within a population of thin phyllosilicate crystals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.