PURPOSE: Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival for women with breast cancer, but not all women who could benefit initiate treatment. Women's belief systems are related to treatment initiation. It has been hypothesized that complementary and alternative (CAM) use is associated with decreased initiation of standard oncology treatments because patients may be exploring alternative treatment approaches. However, there are limited data on the association between CAM use and cancer treatment initiation. We examined the association between CAM use and initiation of adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy in a prospective cohort of early stage breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects participated in a multi-center prospective cohort study of women with early stage invasive breast cancer (n=1,156). National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were used to define groups based on whether chemotherapy was indicated. Three subgroups were created: chemotherapy indicated for subjects <70 years, chemotherapy discretionary for subjects <70 years, and chemotherapy discretionary for subjects ≥70 years. CAM use was assessed based upon self-reported use of 5 CAM modalities, including vitamin/mineral supplements, herbal supplements, other over-the-counter natural products, mind-body based approaches, and body/energy-based treatments. Psychosocial factors potentially related to chemotherapy initiation were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the associations between CAM use and chemotherapy initiation, adjusted for demographic, clinical and psychosocial factors. RESULTS: Current CAM use was reported by 87% of women and 38% reporting current use of ≥3 modalities. The most commonly used CAM modalities were mind body therapies (63%) and other natural products (41%). In bivariate analyses, among women <70 years where chemotherapy was indicated, women who reported current use of vitamins/minerals or current use of all 5 CAM modalities were less likely to initiate chemotherapy compared to non-users (P<.0001), but this was not observed among women for whom chemotherapy was discretionary. Psychosocial factors were also associated with high levels of current CAM use in this group, including higher expectations of adverse effects from chemotherapy, more concerns about the physical effects of chemotherapy, lower beliefs in the benefits of chemotherapy, and lower positive decision balance while making chemotherapy decisions (all P<.05). Among women age <70 years for whom chemotherapy was indicated, 89% initiated treatment, and current use of all 5 CAM modalities was inversely associated with initiation in multivariable analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical factors (OR=0.08, CI: 0.02-0.32). The association remained after separately adjusting for psychosocial factors (all P<.05), except for positive decision balance, which was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: High use of CAM was associated with decreased chemotherapy initiation among women with breast cancer for whom chemotherapy was indicated. It is important for oncologists to discuss CAM use with their patients, especially since high CAM use is associated with negative expectations and beliefs about chemotherapy. Citation Format: Greenlee H, Neugut AI, Falci L, Hillyer GC, Buono D, Roh JM, Ergas IJ, Kwan ML, Lee M, Tsai WY, Shi Z, Lamerato L, Mandelblatt JS, Kushi LH, Hershman DL. Complementary and alternative medicine use and breast cancer chemotherapy initiation: The BQUAL study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-05.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Older adults represent 50% or more of all newly diagnosed cancer patients annually; these patients have multiple morbidities, complicating treatment decision-making.. Discussions about the risks and benefits of cancer treatments might be improved by having data on estimated all-cause survival. ePrognosis (http://eprognosis.ucsf.edu/carey2.php) is an online tool validated in older adults without cancer. We compared survival estimates using ePrognosis to observed survival in a population of women with early stage breast cancer who volunteered for cooperative group studies. Methods: Participants in CALGB 49907 (n=194) and 369901 (n=809) who were age 70+ were included (total n=1003). Both studies had comparable eligibility: primary, newly diagnosed, invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer. In 49907, eligibly also included PS 0-2; in 369901 there were no PS restrictions, but women who failed a screening cognitive exam were excluded. The Carey 2-year Index from ePrognosis was used to estimate all-cause 2-year survival, based on age, sex, and daily function. Function (needing help from another person to bath and shop for groceries, difficulty walking several blocks and pushing or pulling a heavy object) was derived from the EORTC QLC-30. The Carey index from ePrognosis generates scores from 1-10, with higher scores indicating higher probability of death. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to obtain point estimates and confidence intervals for the observed 2-yr survival. A two sided z-test was used to test the hypothesis that the observed survival rate is equivalent to the predicted survival rate. Results: At two years from study entry, 921 women were alive; 56 had died, and 26 were lost to follow-up/withdrawn. The population was, on average, 76 years old (SD 4.8), primarily white (89.3%), and the majority had hormone receptor positive tumors (79.4%). In our population, the Carey 2-years index predicated survival was not significantly different than observed rates in the 0-2 points and underestimated the survival rates for patients who had 3-6 points and 7-10 points. ePrognosis Prediction49907 & 369901 PatientsPointsPredicted Probability of SurvivalNNumber of DeathsObserved Probability of Overall Survival at 2 years (%, 95% CI)p-value0-295%5332595% (93-97%)0.7433-688%4272394% (92-96%)<0.0017-1064%43881% (65-90%)0.017 Conclusions: In this population of older women with breast cancer, using a few readily available data items, ePrognosis provided accurate survival estimates for women with a low probability of death (0-2 points) and underestimated all-cause survival in women with an increased probability of death (3-10 points). Further studies are needed to assess the validity of this tool in samples of cancer patients with higher risks of 2-year mortality. Extended follow-up to validate the tools in predicting 5- and 10-year all-cause and non-cancer mortality risk will further contribute to decision making in older patients. Citation Format: Kimmick G, Pitcher B, Mandelblatt J, Clapp J, Ballman K, Barginear M, Freedman R, Artz A, Klepin H, Lafky J, Hopkins J, Winer E, Hudis C, Muss H, Cohen H, Jatoi A, Hurria A. All-cause survival estimates compared to observed survival in older women with breast cancer in CALGB 49907 and 369901 (Alliance A151503). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-10.