The effect of evaporative air chilling on quality of fresh chicken carcasses was compared with air chilling as reference method. Cooling efficiency and total heat loss were significantly higher for evaporative air chilling. The chilling method was of great importance for weight loss. Chicken chilled in cold air lost considerably more weight than chicken cooled by evaporative air chilling; the difference was 1.8%. The chilling method also affected the skin color and the amount of moisture on skin surface. After evaporative air chilling, the chicken carcasses had a lighter color and more water on the back and under the wings. The moisture content in skin and meat, cooking loss, and pH were not affected by chilling method. Odor attributes of raw chicken and odor and flavor attributes of cooked chicken did not show any significant differences between the two chilling methods. The shelf life of chicken stored at 4 and -1 C were not affected significantly by chilling method. Storage time and temperature appeared to be the decisive factors for sensory and microbiological quality of fresh chicken carcasses.
The effects of dairy ingredients (1,3,5%)-ordinary and high-viscosity sodium caseinate, skim-milk powder, whey protein or demineralized whey powder-on sensory properties and instrumental texture and color of sausages, were investigated. Sausages were formulated with 2 or 4% potato starch and cooked to a core temperature of 76 or 82°C. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed three dominating factors for sensory properties; the first related to dairy ingredients and starch concentrations, the two others to type of dairy ingredients. Results were verified by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results of sensory analysis were further verified by textural and color analysis using PCA and ANOVA, respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.