Abstract-Quality of Life (QL) is hard to assess and seldom measured in patients having carcinomas with an unfavourable prognosis. Oesophageal cancer is one of the malignancies with a low S-year survival rate. Dysphagia (problems in swallowing food) is considered to be the most important indicator of QL in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Moreover, the psycho-social aspects and subjective QL in cancer have recently gained importance.The present study investigated QL in a 132 patients with oesophageal cancer. Eighty-three of them had a surgical operation (removal of part of the oesophagus and part of the stomach, followed by a reconstruction of the digestive tract). Sixty-seven patients filled in questionnaires before and after the operation, Complete sets of data were obtained from 62 patients. Time interval between operation and postoperative assessment varied from 3 to 7 months. Indicators of QL were: Psychological Distress, Phvsical Svmotoms. Global Evaluations, Activitv Level. Swallowing Problems and Food Intake. Swallowing Problems showed moderate correlations with the other QL indicators. Physical Symptoms increased, whereas the Activity Level, Psychological Distress, and Swallowing Problems decreased; Global Evaluations remained unaltered.
In this article a training programme is described for improving interviewing skills of students in the fifth year (junior clerkship) of the medical curriculum. Two interviews with a 'simulated mother' form the core of the programme. The interviews are immediately followed by a feedback session in which the simulated mother discusses the strong and the weak points of the interview. In the feedback she makes use of a checklist with relevant points concerning the content and the process of the interview. Where required the comments are substantiated with fragments of the videotaped interview. In a 2-hour theoretical session, students are told how to prepare themselves for the interview. The learning effects of the training programme using simulated mothers were evaluated in order to determine: (1) the subsequent improvement in interviewing skills; and (2) the effect of the feedback session. It was found that students' interviewing skills improved significantly on the content and the process aspects after one or two interviews. In addition the feedback sessions proved very helpful, although no significant differences were revealed, when comparing the mean group scores for students who had had feedback sessions with the scores for those who had not. The results also revealed that two interviews were insufficient and that the training should include at least three interviews. This was borne out by the large number of students who asked for more interviews with simulated mothers. In the training programme the simulated mothers perform two functions: (1) playing the role of the mother of a sick child; and (2) giving feedback to students regarding their interviewing skills.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.