In 1981, an unknown disease appeared in Spain, the Spanish Toxic Oil Syndrome. Nowadays and despite all efforts, the etiological agent is still unknown. Early studies showed a link between this illness and the consumption of denatured rapeseed oil fraudulently processed and marketed as edible oil. Two families of aniline derivatives present in these oils (fatty acid anilides and acylated phenyl amino propanediol derivatives or PAPs) were found to be good chemical markers of toxic oils. In this work, a new method has been developed to analyze these aniline derivatives in oil samples by HPLC-MS and HPLC-MS/MS with an API source. For their quantification, three different internal standards were used, one for anilides and two for PAPs. Quantification limits were 8 ppm for anilides and 0.2 ppm for PAPs. Anilides and PAPs were found in marker-positive samples at levels up to 50,000 and 330 ppm, respectively. The relative abundance of the different fatty acid anilides and PAPs correlates with the fatty acid composition of the oils. More than 2,600 different samples were analyzed by this method in the most exhaustive screening of suspected toxic oils carried out to date.

Fatty acid esters of 3-(N-phenylamino)-1,2-propanediol are currently considered the best chemical markers of toxic oils related to the Spanish toxic oil syndrome. Recent research in this area has undertaken the exhaustive and quantitative characterization of these compounds in oils collected during the epidemic outbreak. Current methods developed in this laboratory are based on solid phase extraction (SPE) using SCX cartridges followed by HPLC-APCI/MS/MS quantification. To circumvent the long and tedious extraction procedure, the SPE protocol was adapted for automatic extraction and the problems derived from the use of the immiscible solvents required for the SCX extraction were solved. Linearity of the analytical method was found in the same range as for the manual method. Extraction recoveries were 87 and 75% for 2-hydroxy-3-(N-phenylamino)propyl linoleate and 2-(linoleyloxy)-3-(N-phenylamino)propyl linoleate, respectively, and the corresponding coefficients of variation were approximately 1%, greatly improving reproducibility over manual procedures.