The pharmacokinetics of a new tablet formulation of acenocoumarol racemate, an oral anticoagulant agent, has been investigated in 8 normal healthy subjects. The drug was given as a single oral dose of 12 mg. 12 blood samples were collected after administration Plasma acenocoumarol concentrations were determined by a sensitive HPLC method. Areas under the plasma level-time curves for each subject were evaluated by means of the trapezoidal rule. The peak plasma concentration of 244.19-644.23 micrograms/l was reached 1-4 h after drug administration. The terminal phase half-life was 6.29-14.22 h and a systemic clearance was 1.86-5.62 l/h. The new table formulation of acenocoumarol seems to be bioequivalent when compared to the one used so far. For the prediction of systemic availability and estimation of the first-pass metabolism, from plasma level data, a hepatic blood flow rate limited model were used. The systemic availability was 94.22-98.01% and the elimination of the drug on its first-pass through the liver was 1.99-5.78%.

This study presents application of statistical power function for the t-test and ANOVA F-test on the evaluation of diclofenac bioequivalence in trials with the wide variations in sample sizes (N = 12, 18 and 24). The power function, together with appropriate equations tables and figures, is used to calculate the power of the ANOVA for crossover design, the number of subjects for a given value of power and the minimum detectable difference in treatment means for different pharmacokinetic parameters of the formulations. The power of the trial with a small, sample size (N = 12) to detect 20% differences between diclofenac formulations is shown to be more than 0.9 and almost the same as the power of the trial with a large sample size (N = 24). In all trials for all pharmacokinetic parameters the power to detect 20% difference is shown to be more than 0.8. For the power of 0.8, the needed subject number to detect 20% difference in treatment means is the same or smaller than used and the minimum detectable difference is smaller than 20% in all our trials. This investigation shows that bioequivalence studies with small number of subjects (N = 12) may be quite adequate for valid conclusions.

The pharmacokinetics of a new verapamil retard tablet formulation have been investigated in a randomized cross-over bioequivalence study on 12 healthy subjects. The drug was given orally at a single new or standard retard tablet dose of 240mg and at a single intravenous dose of 5mg. Plasma verapamil concentrations were determined by HPLC. New retard tablets produced peak plasma verapamil concentrations of 81.34+/-5.69microg/l, time to peak plasma concentrations of 4.91+/-0.89h and an AUC (0-24h) of 1291+/-103.4h x microg/l, with a terminal phase half-life of 55.1+/-14.9h. After intravenous administration verapamil exhibited biphasic elimination kinetics with a terminal plasma half-life of 2.36+/-0.42h and systemic clearance of 34.32+/-5.81 l/h. Bioavailability of the new peroral retard formulation ranged from 19.49+/-4.41% to 67.69+/-11.70%. Absorption rates and amounts were evaluated by means of the spline-convolutional method. Input rates for the new verapamil retard formulation ranged from 0.77+/-0.20mg/h to 5.57+/-1.58mg/h. The cumulative amount of verapamil input was 39.17+/-9.71% for the new retard tablets. All pharmacokinetic parameters for the new verapamil retard tablet formulation, were in reasonable agreement with the data obtained on already registered verapamil retard formulations, indicating their bioequivalence.