Abstract:Background: Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury associated with hepatic resections and liver transplantation remains a serious complication in clinical practice, in spite of several attempts to solve the problem. Aims: To evaluate the response of the hepatocyte to ischemia Methods: Published data are thus revised. Results: The response of the hepatocyte to ischemia is based on the sensitivity of hepatocytes to different types of ischemia, the kind of cell death of the hepatocyte when it is subjected to ischemia, and on the response of the hepatocyte to the different times and extents of ischemia. Clinical factors including starvation, graft, age, and hepatic steatosis, all of which contribute to enhancing liver susceptibility to ischemia/reperfusion injury. Conclusion: Ischemic preconditioning, based on the induction of a brief ischemia to the liver prior to a prolonged ischemia, has been applied in tumor hepatic resections for reducing hepatic I/R injury and recent clinical studies suggest that this surgical strategy could be appropriate for liver transplantation.

The present study evaluates the effectiveness of ischemic preconditioning and Bcl-2 overexpression against the liver and lung damage that follow hepatic ischemia-reperfusion and investigates the underlying protective mechanisms. Preconditioning and Bcl-2, respectively, reduced the increased tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP)-2 levels observed after hepatic reperfusion. Bcl-2 overexpression or anti-MIP-2 pretreatment seems to be more effective than preconditioning or anti-TNF pretreatment against inflammatory response, microcirculatory disorders, and subsequent hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Furthermore, each one of these strategies individually was unable to completely inhibit hepatic injury. The combination of preconditioning and Bcl-2 overexpression as well as the combined anti-TNF and anti-MIP-2 pretreatment totally prevented hepatic injury, whereas the benefits of preconditioning and Bcl-2 were abolished by TNF and MIP-2. In contrast to preconditioning, Bcl-2 did not modify lung damage induced by hepatic reperfusion. This could be explained by the differential effect of both treatments on TNF release. Anti-TNF therapy or preconditioning, by reducing TNF release, reduced pulmonary inflammatory response, whereas the benefits of preconditioning on lung damage were abolished by TNF. Thus, the induction of both Bcl-2 overexpression in liver and preconditioning, as well as pharmacological strategies that simulated their benefits, such as anti-TNF and anti-MIP-2 therapies, could be new strategies aimed to reduce lung damage and inhibit the hepatic injury associated with hepatic ischemia-reperfusion.