the reform process in the electricity sector of any country has as main objective the design of a power market capable to induce a reliable and efficient energy supply, translated into adequate tariffs. Brazil started its reform process in 1996, inspired by similar schemes in the electricity sector of more developed countries.However, the existence of particularities in the country's hydroelectric energy market, such as weak spot price signals for system expansion and difficulties to determine benchmark prices, avoided a smooth transition to a fully deregulated market. In 2004, a revisited power sector model was launched, aiming at alleviating the difficulties of the first model. The core of the new proposals lies on the use of contract obligation and energy supply auctions as the backbone for the efficient contracting and supply adequacy. Supply auctions were held in 2004-2005, with a volume of about 20,000 average MW contracted involving about 60 billion USD in financial transactions. This work discusses the implementation of auctions of energy contracts and call options in Brazil as part of the mechanisms to ensure supply adequacy adopted in the second stage of its power sector reform.Index Terms--Power system economics, power system planning, supply adequacy.
this paper discusses how the issue of supply adequacy is treated in the Brazilian power market, analyzing lessons learned from past experiences and describing the solutions that are being implemented to reconcile competition in generation with an adequate supply.Index Terms--Power system economics, power system planning, hydroelectric power generation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.