No abstract

Svedmyr J, Nyberg E, Thunqvist P, Å sbrink-Nilsson E, Hedlin G. Prophylactic intermittent treatment with inhaled corticosteroids of asthma exacerbations due to airway infections in toddlers. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 42-7. Stockholm. ISSN 0803-5253The aim of this study was to investigate whether budesonide, for 10 d, administered at the first sign of an upper respiratory tract infection, could reduce asthma symptoms in 1-3-y-old children with asthma during infections. The primary efficacy variable was symptom scores. The study had a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with parallel groups. Fifty-five children with a mean age of 26 months received either budesonide or placebo via a spacer with a facemask. Each child was monitored for 1 y. Budesonide was given 400 mg q.i.d. for the first 3 d and b.i.d. for 7 d. Symptoms (cough, wheeze, noisy breathing and breathlessness) were scored (0-3) daily by the parents. Asthma symptom scores were lower in children treated with budesonide than in those given placebo. The effect was most pronounced for cough and noisy breathing, but it did not affect the need for hospital care. In conclusion, treatment with budesonide, started at the first sign of a respiratory infection, reduced asthma symptoms in toddlers with episodic asthma.

Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a common cause of deterioration of asthma in children. We investigated if inhaled steroids (budesonide), started early after URTI, could reduce asthma. Thirty-one children, 3-10 years of age, with deterioration during URTI participated. The study design was double-blind, crossover and placebo-controlled. Peak-expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom scores were recorded. Four treatment periods of 9 days, two with budesonide and two with placebo, were planned. Treatment was started at the first sign of URTI. Budesonide/placebo was given by Turbuhaler at 0.2 mg qid for 3 days, tid for 3 and bid for the last 3 days. Twenty-two children completed 67 periods. Eleven visited the emergency room, only three during budesonide therapy. Five received oral steroids and two where admitted to hospital, all receiving placebo. Symptom scores were not significantly lower during budesonide treatment. PEF, both morning and evening, was significantly higher during budesonide than placebo (p = 0.015 and p = 0.022). Inhaled budesonide can attenuate exacerbation of URTI-induced asthma.

Hedlin G, Svedmyr J, Ryden A-C. Systemic effects of a short course of betamethasone compared with high-dose inhaled budesonide in early childhood asthma. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 48-51. Stockholm. ISSN 0803-5253 Forty children aged 1-3 y completed a placebo-controlled study on the effects of 10 d of inhaled budesonide for asthma caused by respiratory tract infection. The effects on symptoms were significantly better in the active than in the placebo group. In 20 of these children the systemic effects of high-dose inhaled budesonide for 10 d and the effect of a 3-d course of oral betamethasone on asthma exacerbation were evaluated. Systemic effects were evaluated by measuring morning cortisol in serum and urine, and the bone markers osteocalcin, ICTP (the C-terminal telopeptide region of type I collagen) and PIIINP (an N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen) in serum before and at the end (d 7-10) of treatment (1600 mg budesonide d À1 for 3 d and 800 mg for 7 d). In 9 children, measurements were taken on d 3 of a 3-d course of betamethasone (6, 4 and 2 mg) for asthma exacerbation and 14 d later. There were no signs of systemic effects after 7-10 d of budesonide. After 3 d of betamethasone, serum cortisol decreased from a median of 263 to 26 nmol l À1 , urine cortisol/creatinine from 19.9 to 7.2 nmol l À1 , osteocalcin from 31.4 to 5.5 mg l À1 , ICTP from 19.4 to 8.5 mg l À1 and PIIINP from 12.3 to 5.9 mg l À1 . Two weeks later, the levels were back to normal. In conclusion, short courses of oral betamethasone have pronounced systemic effects, whereas 10 d of high doses of budesonide do not produce significant systemic effects.

Aim We compared potential differences in drug delivery between different valved holding chambers (VHCs) used by asthma patients, with and without facemasks. Methods An in vitro study design was created using a fluticasone propionate (FP) pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) connected to a VHC. VHCs without facemasks and with sealed and unsealed facemasks were placed against face models that mimicked the features of a 1‐year‐old infant and a 4‐year‐old child. We analysed the amount of FP deposited on the filter in the face model after five breaths with a tidal volume of 75 mL. Results Our measurements showed significant differences in the amounts of FP deposited on the filters, even without facemasks. The amount of FP delivered through the VHC and facemask combinations differed significantly, depending on the degree of the lack of facemask to face seal. All the tested VHCs showed significantly better drug output without a facemask. Conclusion The VHC and facemasks chosen had a considerable and significant impact on FP delivery. The facemask seal should be checked whenever a VHC facemask combination is used. Young children should be taught to use the VHC mouthpiece as early as possible to optimise FP delivery and achieve more effective asthma therapy.