Models for predicting cummulative genetic gain from recurrent selection applicable to predominantly outcrossing plant species are derived to include the effect of observations on clonal replicates (ramets) in addition to observations on individuals and family means. Such models are discussed with special reference to forest trees. The consequence of redistributing effort from individuals to ramets is investigated for several conditions with a fixed number of families and fixed total test size. Factors that affect the distribution of variance among sources and factors that affect individual selection intensity are the primary determinants of the optimum distribution of effort. The optimum number of ramets ranged from 1 to 6 for the conditions tested and the efficiency of redistribution (ratio of gain for the optimum distribution to the gain for the single-ramet, or non-clonal case) ranged from 1.00 to 1.20. Using clonal replicates in genetic tests usually results in increased cummulative genetic gain relative to non-clonal tests, without an increase in test effort.

Genetic diversity measures at 54 isozyme loci coding for 16 enzymes in megagametophytes were compared between preharvest and postharvest gene pools of two adjacent virgin, old‐growth (∼250 years) stands of eastern white pine ( Pinus strobus L.) in the Galloway Lake Old Pine Area of central Ontario. The concurrence of genetic diversity changes between the stands suggests that real and repeatable genetic erosion occurred in these gene pools as a result of harvesting. The total and mean number of alleles detected in each stand were reduced by approximately 25% after tree density reductions of 75%. The percentage of polymorphic loci dropped by about 33% from preharvest levels. About 40% of the low frequency (0.25> p ≥ 0.01) alleles and 80% of the rare ( p < 0.01) alleles were lost from each stand because of harvesting. Hypothetical multilocus gametic diversity was reduced by about 40% in each stand after harvesting. Latent genetic potential of each stand was reduced by about 50%, suggesting that the ability of these gene pools to adapt to changing environmental conditions may have been compromised. Heterozygosity estimates in the postharvest stands did not reflect reductions in allelic richness due to harvesting. Observed heterozygosity increased by 12% in one stand after harvesting, even though other genetic diversity measures decreased. Gene frequency changes due to harvesting imply that gene pools of naturally regenerated progeny stands may be quite different from the original parental stands. Silvicultural practices should ensure that the gene pools of remaining pristine old‐growth stands have been reconstituted in the regenerating stands.