A study was designed to assess the effect of supplemental oral methyltestosterone in the treatment of impotence associated with low total serum androgen levels. A total of 22 hypogonadal impotent men underwent a comprehensive investigation of erectile dysfunction, including an evaluation of the pituitary-gonadal axis. The patients then received a 1-month course of 2 different commercial preparations of oral methyltestosterone. Hormonal changes induced by the medication were assessed on days 15 and 30 of treatment. The patients kept daily records of sexual activity, and completed visual analogue scales to assess energy levels, mood and sensation of well being on a weekly basis. Supra-physiological levels of total serum testosterone were achieved in every patient but the free fraction of the hormone did not increase proportionally and in many cases a marked decrease was recorded. In all but 1 subject there was a decrease in circulating sex hormone binding globulin. Pituitary gonadotropin levels showed a marked decrease at the end of treatment. The clinical response was disappointing. Only 9% of the patients reported a complete recovery of sexual function. Visual analogue scales did not reveal noticeable changes for any individual in the levels of energy, mood or feeling of well being between pretreatment and posttreatment assessments. Oral methyltestosterone is of limited effectiveness in men with hypogonadal impotence. The positive responses in this study were recorded in men with the most profound deficiency. Exogenous administration of androgens to impotent men should be limited to those with profound hypogonadism as documented by at least 2 abnormal serum free testosterone determinations.

No abstract

E299Cite as: Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7(5-6):e299-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.11294 Published online May 13, 2013 (early released July 16, 2012). AbstractObjective: We compared the cause-specific survival of patients who received radiotherapy to those who received surgery for cure of their prostate cancer using a number of design and analytic steps to mitigate confounding by indication. Methods: This was a case-cohort study of 2213 patients in the Ontario Cancer Registry diagnosed between 1990 and 1998 who were either treatment candidates or received curative radiotherapy or surgery. Cases included patients who died of prostate cancer within 10 years. The study population was restricted to those who were candidates for either treatment (radiotherapy or surgery) based on disease severity (low and intermediate risk using the Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada risk groups). The median follow-up was 51 months. Cause-specific survival was analyzed using Cox-proportional hazards regression with casecohort variance adjustment. Results from intent-to-treat analyses were compared to results by treatment received. Results: Adjusted hazard ratios for risk of prostate cancer death for radiotherapy compared to surgery for the entire study population were 1.62 (95%CI 1.00-2.61) and 2.02 (1.19-3.43) analyzing by intent-to-treat and treatment received, respectively. Intent-to-treat hazard ratios for the low-and intermediate-risk groups were 0.87 (0.28-2.76) and 1.57 (0.95-2.61), respectively. Conclusion: Overall results were driven by the finding in the intermediate-risk group, which indicated that radiotherapy was not as effective as surgery in this group. Confirmation was needed with special attention paid to risk stratification and the impact of more contemporary delivery of these treatment options.

Overall results were driven by the finding in the intermediate-risk group, which indicated that radiotherapy was not as effective as surgery in this group. Confirmation was needed with special attention paid to risk stratification and the impact of more contemporary delivery of these treatment options.

No abstract