No abstract

Agricultural soils are the main anthropogenic source of nitrous oxide (N 2 O), largely because of nitrogen (N) fertilizer use. Commonly, N 2 O emissions are expressed as a function of N application rate. This suggests that smaller fertilizer applications always lead to smaller N 2 O emissions. Here we argue that, because of global demand for agricultural products, agronomic conditions should be included when assessing N 2 O emissions. Expressing N 2 O emissions in relation to crop productivity (expressed as above-ground N uptake: 'yieldscaled N 2 O emissions') can express the N 2 O efficiency of a cropping system. We show how conventional relationships between N application rate, N uptake and N 2 O emissions can result in minimal yield-scaled N 2 O emissions at intermediate fertilizer-N rates. Key findings of a meta-analysis on yield-scaled N 2 O emissions by non-leguminous annual crops (19 independent studies and 147 data points) revealed that yield-scaled N 2 O emissions were smallest (8.4 g N 2 O-N kg −1 N uptake) at application rates of approximately 180-190 kg N ha −1 and increased sharply after that (26.8 g N 2 O-N kg −1 N uptake at 301 kg N ha −1 ). If the above-ground N surplus was equal to or smaller than zero, yield-scaled N 2 O emissions remained stable and relatively small. At an N surplus of 90 kg N ha −1 yield-scaled emissions increased threefold. Furthermore, a negative relation between N use efficiency and yield-scaled N 2 O emissions was found. Therefore, we argue that agricultural management practices to reduce N 2 O emissions should focus on optimizing fertilizer-N use efficiency under median rates of N input, rather than on minimizing N application rates.

Applying biochar to soil is thought to have multiple benefits, from helping mitigate climate change [1,2], to managing waste [3] to conserving soil [4]. Biochar is also widely assumed to boost crop yield [5,6], but there is controversy regarding the extent and cause of any yield benefit [7]. Here we use a global-scale meta-analysis to show that biochar has, on average, no effect on crop yield in temperate latitudes, yet elicits a 25% average increase in yield in the tropics. In the tropics, biochar increased yield through liming and fertilization, consistent with the low soil pH, low fertility, and low fertilizer inputs typical of arable tropical soils. We also found that, in tropical soils, high-nutrient biochar inputs stimulated yield substantially more than low-nutrient biochar, further supporting the role of nutrient fertilization in the observed yield stimulation. In contrast, arable soils in temperate regions are moderate in pH, higher in fertility, and generally receive higher fertilizer inputs, leaving little room for additional benefits from biochar. Our findings demonstrate that the yield-stimulating effects of biochar are not universal, but may especially benefit agriculture in low-nutrient, acidic soils in the tropics. Biochar management in temperate zones should focus on potential non-yield benefits such as lime and fertilizer cost savings, greenhouse gas emissions control, and other ecosystem services.

Ruminant production contributes to emissions of nitrogen (N) to the environment, principally ammonia (NH 3 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and di-nitrogen (N 2 ) to air, nitrate (NO 3 2 ) to groundwater and particulate N to surface waters. Variation in dietary N intake will particularly affect excretion of urinary N, which is much more vulnerable to losses than is faecal N. Our objective is to review dietary effects on the level and form of N excreted in cattle urine, as well as its consequences for emissions of N 2 O. The quantity of N excreted in urine varies widely. Urinary N excretion, in particular that of urea N, is decreased upon reduction of dietary N intake or an increase in the supply of energy to the rumen microorganisms and to the host animal itself. Most of the N in urine (from 50% to well over 90%) is present in the form of urea. Other nitrogenous components include purine derivatives (PD), hippuric acid, creatine and creatinine. Excretion of PD is related to rumen microbial protein synthesis, and that of hippuric acid to dietary concentration of degradable phenolic acids. The N concentration of cattle urine ranges from 3 to 20 g/l. High-dietary mineral levels increase urine volume and lead to reduced urinary N concentration as well as reduced urea concentration in plasma and milk. In lactating dairy cattle, variation in urine volume affects the relationship between milk urea and urinary N excretion, which hampers the use of milk urea as an accurate indicator of urinary N excretion. Following its deposition in pastures or in animal houses, ubiquitous microorganisms in soil and waters transform urinary N components into ammonium (NH 4 1 ), and thereafter into NO 3 2 and ultimately in N 2 accompanied with the release of N 2 O. Urinary hippuric acid, creatine and creatinine decompose more slowly than urea. Hippuric acid may act as a natural inhibitor of N 2 O emissions, but inhibition conditions have not been defined properly yet. Environmental and soil conditions at the site of urine deposition or manure application strongly influence N 2 O release. Major dietary strategies to mitigating N 2 O emission from cattle operations include reducing dietary N content or increasing energy content, and increasing dietary mineral content to increase urine volume. For further reduction of N 2 O emission, an integrated animal nutrition and excreta management approach is required.Keywords: nitrogen, urine, cattle, nitrous oxide, mitigation ImplicationsCattle contribute to global warming through emission of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) from urine and faeces. Urinary nitrogen (N) is much more susceptible to gaseous losses than faecal N. To reduce urinary N excretion and N 2 O emission and improve N efficiency of cattle, dietary levels of N should be decreased and an optimal balance between N and energy substrates in the diet should be aimed at. Increasing urine volume by increased dietary mineral contents appears a promising N 2 O mitigation strategy, particularly in pasture. Further reduction of effective mitigation strategies...

No abstract