Summary. Given the known role of the fas cytolytic pathway in B-cell regulation, we evaluated whether fas±fasL interactions might induce chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) cell death. De novo CLL cells expressed a low level of surface fas, and were not lysed by fasL-bearing cells. CLL cells cultured in media containing the type I cytokines interleukin (IL)-12 or interferon (IFN)-a had increased fas expression, and were readily lysed by fasL-bearing cells. In contrast, the type II cytokine IL-4 did not increase CLL cell fas, and abrogated type I cytokine-induced fas up-regulation. With prolonged culture, IL-4 exposed CLL cells expressed an intermediate level of fas; however, such CLL cells were resistant to fas-mediated lysis. These results indicate that IL-4 inhibits fas-mediated killing of CLL cells at the level of both fas receptor expression and post-receptor events. Additionally, we have de®ned in vitro culture conditions which generate fasL-bearing T cells from CLL patients; such T cells ef®ciently mediated fas-based lysis of autologous fas-positive CLL cells. We therefore conclude that type I and type II cytokines differentially regulate the fas pathway in CLL cells, and that a combination of type I cytokines and fasL-expressing T cells may represent a new approach to the immunotherapy of CLL.
TRE was not as severely impaired as anticipated and was variable based on plane of measure. Time in a rehabilitation setting produced significant improvements in functional outcomes but TRE improvements were not as robust. These results indicate a need for further investigation of the strength of the interrelationship between TRE and function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.