The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 disease in the French national population of dialysis patients, their course of illness and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality. Our study included all patients on dialysis recorded in the French REIN Registry in April 2020. Clinical characteristics at last follow-up and the evolution of COVID-19 illness severity over time were recorded for diagnosed cases (either suspicious clinical symptoms, characteristic signs on the chest scan or a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) for SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1,621 infected patients were reported on the REIN registry from March 16th, 2020 to May 4th, 2020. Of these, 344 died. The prevalence of COVID-19 patients varied from less than 1% to 10% between regions. The probability of being a case was higher in males, patients with diabetes, those in need of assistance for transfer or treated at a self-care unit. Dialysis at home was associated with a lower probability of being infected as was being a smoker, a former smoker, having an active malignancy, or peripheral vascular disease. Mortality in diagnosed cases (21%) was associated with the same causes as in the general population. Higher age, hypoalbuminemia and the presence of an ischemic heart disease were statistically independently associated with a higher risk of death. Being treated at a selfcare unit was associated with a lower risk. Thus, our study showed a relatively low frequency of COVID-19 among dialysis patients contrary to what might have been assumed.

No abstract

The "gold standard" method to evaluate the mass balances achieved during dialysis for a given solute remains total dialysate collection (TDC). However, since handling over 100 liter volumes is unfeasible in our current dialysis units, alternative methods have been proposed, including urea kinetic modeling, partial dialysate collection (PDC) and more recently, monitoring of dialysate urea by on-line devices. Concerned by the complexity and costs generated by these devices, we aimed to adapt the simple "gold standard" TDC method to clinical practice by diminishing the total volumes to be handled. We describe a new system based on partial dialysate collection, the continuous spent sampling of dialysate (CSSD), and present its technical validation. Further, and for the first time, we report a long-term assessment of dialysis dosage in a dialysis clinic using both the classical PDC and the new CSSD system in a group of six stable dialysis patients who were followed for a period of three years. For the CSSD technique, spent dialysate was continuously sampled by a reversed automatic infusion pump at a rate of 10 ml/hr. The piston was automatically driven by the dialysis machine: switched on when dialysis started, off when dialysis terminated and held during the by pass periods. At the same time the number of production cycles of dialysate was monitored and the total volume of dialysate was calculated by multiplying the volume of the production chamber by the number of cycles. Urea and creatinine concentrations were measured in the syringe and the masses were obtained by multiplying this concentration by the total volume. CSSD and TDC were simultaneously performed in 20 dialysis sessions. The total mass of urea removed was calculated as 58038 and 60442 mmol/session (CSSD and TDC respectively; 3.1 +/- 1.2% variation; r = 0.99; y = 0.92x -28.9; P < 0.001). The total mass of creatinine removed was 146,941,143 and 150,071,195 mumol/session (2.2 +/- 0.9% variation; r = 0.99; y = 0.99x + 263; P < 0.001). To determine the long-term clinical use of PDC and CSSD, all the dialysis sessions monitored during three consecutive summers with PDC (during 1993 and 1994) and with CSSD (1995) in six stable dialysis patients were included. The clinical study comparing PDC and CSSD showed similar urea removal: 510 +/- 59 during the first year with PDC and 516 +/- 46 mmol/dialysis session during the third year, using CSSD. Protein catabolic rate (PCR) could be calculated from total urea removal and was 1.05 +/- 0.11 and 1.05 +/- 0.09 g/kg/day with PDC and CSSD for the same periods. PCR values were clearly more stable when calculated from the daily dialysate collections than when obtained with urea kinetic modeling performed once monthly. We found that CSSD is a simple and accurate method to monitor mass balances of urea or any other solute of clinical interest. With CSSD, dialysis efficacy can be monitored at every dialysis session without the need for bleeding a patient. As it is external to the dialysis machine, it can be attached to any ty...

Dialysate purity has become a major concern in hemodialysis since it has been shown that microbial-derived products were stimulating the production and the release of proinflammatory cytokines in hemodialysis patients. This chronic microinflammatory state induced by hemodialysis has been putatively implicated in the development of dialysis-related pathology. In order to prevent risk related to these offenders and to reduce patient/dialysis interaction, it appears highly desirable to use ultrapure dialysis fluid aiming at sterility and apyrogenicity on a regular basis. Ultrapure dialysate results from a complex chain of production where purity grade relies on the weaker link of this chain. Technical aspects and pitfalls in the production of ultrapure dialysate are summarized in this paper. Production of ultrapure dialysate may be achieved on a routine basis, provided adequate components are used, and hygienic handling is regularly ensured. It includes the use of ultrapure water, clean and or sterile electrolytic concentrates (liquid or powder), implementation of ultrafilters on hemodialysis machines, microbiologic monitoring and hygienic handling of the chain with frequent disinfection. Safety and reliability of ultrapure dialysate production relies on a continuous quality assurance process, where results are coupled to corrective action in a feedback loop process.

Dialysate purity has become a major concern in recent years since it was shown that low levels of endotoxin in dialysate were able to induce the production of proinflammatory cytokines, which were putatively implicated in the development of dialysis-related pathology. On-line haemodiafiltration (HDF; or haemofiltration) using the dialysate as the source of substitution fluid magnifies this risk and reinforces the critical role of the dialysate quality to be used. In order to virtually abolish the risk related to dialysate contaminants, it is mandatory to ensure the highest purity of the dialysate used in order that the substitution fluid produced satisfies the quality demands of a sterile and pyrogen-free infusion solution. Ultrapure dialysate production is therefore a common need for all on-line systems where substitution fluid is prepared continuously by sterilizing filtration of the dialysate. However, since dialysate purity plays a role in the complex haemocompatibility interaction which occurs during the haemodialysis session, the use of ultrapure dialysate must be considered as a suitable option for all haemodialysis modalities. To achieve this goal, one must keep in mind that ultrapure dialysate and infusate result from a complex chain of production where ultrapurity and/or sterility of the final solution relies on the weakest or worst component of the chain. Reliable production of ultrapure dialysate and infusate relies on several prerequisites: use of ultrapure water, use of clean electrolytic concentrates, implementation of ultrafilters on specifically designed HDF machines, microbiological monitoring of the chain with adequate and sensitive methods, and hygienic handling of the chain including frequent disinfection to reduce the level of contamination and to prevent biofilm formation. When properly done, the safety and reliability of on-line systems have been confirmed in large clinical studies. It is now time to validate the on-line process in large controlled clinical trials.