The aim of this study was to compare clearance rates and related characteristics of patients carrying KPC-producing carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) with those of patients carrying NDM-1-producing CPE. Methods: From November 2010 to October 2016, consecutive patients whose clinical or surveillance cultures yielded CPE were prospectively identified and followed in a 2700-bed tertiary referral hospital. CPE control protocols included strict single-room isolation, contact precautions and weekly surveillance cultures. CPE clearance was defined as three or more consecutive CPE-negative cultures without relapse. We compared patients carrying NDM-1 CPE and KPC and those with and without clearance. The time to CPE clearance or discharge was assessed using the KaplaneMeier method and NDM-1 CPE and KPC CPE groups were compared. Results: A total of 147 patients carrying CPE, 106 with NDM-1 and 41 with KPC, were included in the study. At the time of hospital discharge, 12 of the 106 patients carrying NDM-1 CPE were clear of CPE, whereas none of the KPC CPE patients were (NDM-1, 11.3% (12/106) versus KPC, 0% (0/41), p 0.02). There was no significant association between CPE clearance and factors such as an immunocompromised condition, antibiotic usage, or species of colonizing organism. Among 40 patients who were readmitted, CPE non-clearance was significantly higher in patients carrying KPC CPE (NDM-1, 36.7% (11/30) versus KPC, 80.0% (8/10), p 0.03). Conclusions: Compared with NDM-1 CPE patients, patients carrying KPC CPE had a significantly lower probability of clearance during hospitalization. Furthermore, KPC CPE carriage persisted for a substantial period of time following patient discharge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.