The discussion was initiated by a paper comparing the measurement of dialysis dose (Kt/V) and solute clearance using on-line ultra-violet absorbance, blood and dialysate urea and ionic dialysance by Uhlin et al (NDT 2006). Participants from 14 countries discussed the theory behind the UV absorbance technique and the potential for its use in routine practice, the correlation between Kt/V measured using different methods, the use of ionic dialysance and the optimisation of dose monitoring. The 'take-home' messages from the discussion were that UV-absorbance could help ensure the delivery of dialysis dose as it provides real time feedback on the effect interventions such as repositioning of needles. The technology is relatively inexpensive and requires no consumables but changes in the dialysis machine settings could lead to misleading measurements if not communicated to the UV monitor. Session-to-session variation in dialysis dose can be measured using on-line clearance monitoring. If it is already on the machine and costs nothing, why not use it? Alternatively, regular access recirculation checks and a record of the total blood volume processed at each session allow problems with delivered dialysis dose to be picked up between routine blood tests.

The survey, realized in 2002-03 in the North-East of Italy, describes renal care in dialysis services. A questionnaire, structured at European level, was sent to all dialysis centres by mail. The questionnaire was returned from 21 centres (61.8%) and related satellite units. Results show nonhomogeneity in renal care. Some important results were: low use of peritoneal dialysis (18%), compared to the rest of Europe, elevated presence of older people on haemodialysis, reduced percentage of patients on transplantation waiting list, diffused use of isolation for HCV positive patients, high use of AV fistulae (84%), low employment of renal technicians, absence of renal dieticians and social workers and nurses performing prevalently direct care. Data can be used for different goals: benchmarking activities, selection of deeper research topics and development of more oriented continuous education activities.

The survey (EPD) took place during December 2002-January 2003 and presents renal care in Greece. A questionnaire, structured at European level and translated into Greek, was sent to all dialysis centres (114) by post. The questionnaire was returned from 74 centres (64.9%). Some important results were: low use of peritoneal dialysis (13.3%), half of PD patients over 65 years old, one ninth of patients on transplantation waiting list, isolation for HBV positive patients (less for HCV and HIV), high use of AV fistulae (71.2%), maintenance and repair of dialysis machines by company technicians, absence of renal dieticians and social workers (but availability from hospital employees) one nurse every 5.54 patients (3.72 if nurse assistants are included), disinfection between shifts carried out chemically (hot or cold) and puncturing of vascular access performed mainly by nurses and nurse assistants. Data can be used to pressurise government for more scientists in the multidisciplinary team to be hired in hospitals, develop further research topics and to develop continuous education programmes.

In order to evaluate the quality of nephrology nursing in Flanders, three quality indicators (anaemia, dialysis dose and patient satisfaction) were studied in 11 Flemish dialysis centres, including 521 haemodialysis patients. Median haematocrit (Hct) was 33.7 with 42% of patients not reaching the target level of 33. Median percentage removal of urea (PRU) was 64.8 with 52% of patients showing values below the target level of 65. PRU levels were significantly influenced by needle technique, type of vascular access, sex, duration of dialysis and diabetes The patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that most patients particularly appreciated the professional skills of the health care workers. On completing this study, we experienced that the regular use of well-established indicators to assess the quality of nephrology nursing, is mandatory.

This paper reports the findings from the European Practice Database project (1) providing an overview of transplant practice in Europe and patient selection. From the 276 centres surveyed 25 recorded performing patient transplants across eight different countries. The overall figures indicate that the waiting list for transplants is made up of 38% women and 9% of patients above the age of 65 years. All countries offered pre-transplant counselling and screening and post-transplant follow-up, but the extent to which these activities occurred varied. The waiting/transplant ratio ranged from one in Norway to eight in Slovakia. Differences still exist as a result of country specific policies and legislation regarding transplantation.