No abstract

Although grain boundaries are known to dominate the bulk properties of many technologically important materials, in most cases there is no fundamental atomic scale understanding of why they should have such an effect. One of the problems in developing this understanding is that conventional structure determination techniques, such as phase contrast imaging in TEM or Z-contrast imaging in STEM, produce only a 2-dimensional projection of the crystal structure. Atomic scale compositional changes must be simulated and a unique interpretation is clouded by boundary reconstructions and strain effects. Furthermore, neither technique provides any information on the local changes in the electronic structure that are critical for both the electrical and mechanical properties of the boundary.EELS provides a means to quantify local changes in both composition and electronic structure. However, without a knowledge of the structure, interpretation of any observed changes at grain boundaries is extremely difficult.

Grain boundaries have long been known to have a dominant effect on the electronic properties of polycrystalline materials. In the case of electroceramic oxides, the thermodynamics of defect formation (vacancies or interstitials, cations or anions) are usually invoked to predict the presence of a space charge potential at the grain boundaries. The relative energetics for the formation of each type of defect determines the size and sign of this potential barrier and thus, the effect that boundaries have on the overall electronic properties of the materials. However, a limitation to this continuum thermodynamics approach is that it does not consider the effect of the grain boundary structure.To investigate whether the grain boundary atomic structure can have an effect on the energetics of defect formation and hence the electronic properties, here we examine the structure of Σ5 boundaries in two systems, SrTiO3 (perovskite) and TiO2(rutile).

Although grain boundaries typically account for only a small fraction of a material, they can have far reaching effects on the overall bulk scale properties. These effects are usually simply linked to the boundary having a different atomic arrangement to the bulk. A necessary first step in understanding the structure-property relationships is therefore a detailed determination of the boundary structure.One means of obtaining detailed information on the structure of grain boundaries is through correlated Z-contrast imaging and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). The Z-contrast image generates a map of the grain boundary which can be used to position the probe in defined locations for spectroscopy. In the case of oxides, a structural model of the metal atom positions can be determined directly from the image. Furthermore, using a simple bond-valence sum minimization routine, the oxygen atoms can be placed so that the structure contains atoms that have valences consistent with their expected formal valence state.