Cefbuperazone was compared with other currently available and investigational antibiotics against 278 clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli by an agar dilution method. Cefbuperazone and cefotetan were equally active against Bacteroides fragiis, with 8% of the organisms tested found to be resistant to 32 ,ug of either drug per ml, Cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefmetazole were less active against these strains; cefoxitin, moxalactam, piperacillin, clindamycin, and metronidazole were more active. None of the agents were consistently active against any of the other anaerobic gram-negative bacilli except imipenem, for which the minimum concentration required to inhibit 90% of all strains tested was 4 ,ug/ml. A 10,000-fold increase in inoculum size caused an increase in the MIC of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cefoperazone bUt not of-cefbuperazone, cefotetan, or cefoxitin. Investigation of the mechanism of resistance to cephalosporin-like agents demonstrated a correlation between the level of resistance and Il-lactamase activity. Cefbuperazone, cefotetan, and cefoxitin were not hydrolyzed, had lower MICs, and were less affected by changes in inoculum size than were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefoperazone.This study was undertaken to evaluate the activity of cefbuperazone, several new penicillins and cephalosporins, moxalactam, and imipenem against clinically important, frequently occurring anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and compare them with currently available agents which have useful activity against anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobic gramnegative bacilli were chosen for the evaluation for the following reasons: (i) these organisms are the major pathogenic anaerobes isolated in the clinical laboratories of the Medical University of South Carolina teaching hospitals; (ii) antimicrobial susceptibility of these organisms is not frequently tested in routine hospital laboratories; and (iii) there is great confusion as to which antimicrobial agents are most effective against these organisms in vitro. MIC, inoculum size effects, stability of the compounds to Bacteroides fragilis ,B-lactamase, and contribution of ,-lactamase to resistance were also investigated. Thirty-one strains of Bacteroides species which did not fit into any particular designation were also studied. Fifteen strains of B. melaninogenicus and 15 strains of Fusobacterium species were also studied. Organisms were stored at -70°C on glass beads coated with 1% brain heart infusion agar. B. fragilis ATCC 25285 and B. thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741 were used throughout the study as control organisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS AntibioticsSusceptibility studies. MICs for the organisms tested were determined by the agar dilution method described by Sutter et al. (14). Overnight cultures of test organisms were diluted to the optical density of a 0.5 McFarland standard. These suspensions were inoculated with a Steers-Foltz replicator onto brain heart infusion agar supplemented with cysteine, hemin, and menadione and containing serial twofold d...
Amifloxacin (WIN 49375) activity against a well-defined group of gentamicin-resistant gram-negative bacilli was compared with the activity of 11 other antimicrobial agents. For all strains, amifloxacin and norfloxacin were the most active agents, followed by cefotaxime and moxalactam. For Acinetobacter sp. only amifloxacin had an achievable MIC for 90% of the strains. Amifloxacin joins other newly developed DNA gyrase inhibitors as potentially useful agents for infections due to aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacilli.The proliferation of antibiotic resistance, particularly among gram-negative bacteria, has prompted a continuing search for new agents unaffected by existing mechanisms of resistance. The quinolones are a group of synthetic antimicrobial agents whose prototype, nalidixic acid, was developed over 30 years ago (5,7,10 Fig. 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.