BackgroundWhile the role of acute non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to improve outcome in acute life-threatening hypercapnic respiratory failure in COPD, the evidence of clinical efficacy of long-term home NIV (LTH-NIV) for management of COPD is less. This document provides evidence-based recommendations for the clinical application of LTH-NIV in chronic hypercapnic COPD patients.Materials and methodsThe European Respiratory Society task force committee was composed of clinicians, methodologists and experts in the field of LTH-NIV. The committee developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading, Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. The GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations. A number of topics were addressed under a narrative format which provides a useful context for clinicians and patients.ResultsThe task force committee delivered conditional recommendations for four actionable PICO (target population-intervention-comparator-outcome) questions, 1) suggesting for the use of LTH-NIV in stable hypercapnic COPD; 2) suggesting for the use of LTH-NIV in COPD patients following a COPD exacerbation requiring acute NIV 3) suggesting for the use of NIV settings targeting a reduction in carbon dioxide and 4) suggesting for using fixed pressure support as first choice ventilator mode.ConclusionsManaging hypercapnia may be an important intervention for improving the health outcome of COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. The task force conditionally supports the application of LTH-NIV to improve health outcome by targeting a reduction in carbon dioxide in COPD patients with persistent hypercapnic respiratory failure. These recommendations should be applied in clinical practice by practitioners that routinely care for chronic hypercapnic COPD patients.
Although eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) has been a subject of numerous studies, its clinical significance still remains unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate: 1) the relative incidence and aetiology of EPE; 2) the predictors of malignancy in patients with EPE; and 3) the relationship between repeated thoracentesis and pleural fluid eosinophilia.A retrospective analysis of 2,205 pleural fluid samples from 1,868 patients treated between 1995 and 2007 was performed.We identified 135 patients with EPE (7.2% of all patients with pleural effusion) and 153 EPE samples. The most common condition associated with EPE was malignancy (34.8%) followed by infectious (19.2%), unknown (14.1%), post-traumatic (8.9%) and miscellaneous (23.0%) pleural effusions. The incidence of malignancy was significantly higher in patients with a lower (f40%) pleural fluid eosinophil percentage. 40 patients with EPE underwent a second thoracentesis. In 16, eosinophilia was present in both pleural fluid samples, 14 revealed pleural fluid eosinophilia only after the second thoracentesis and 10 had eosinophilia only in the first pleural fluid sample.Pleural fluid eosinophilia should not be regarded as a predictor of nonmalignant aetiology. Probability of malignancy is lower in effusions with a high eosinophil percentage. The incidence of EPE in patients undergoing second thoracentesis is not different to that found during the first thoracentesis.KEYWORDS: Eosinophilic pleural effusion, eosinophils, pleural effusion, pleural fluid, pleural fluid eosinophilia E osinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) is usually defined as a pleural effusion (PE) that contains o10% of eosinophils [1,2]. The relative incidence of EPE has been estimated at between 5% and 16% of all PEs [1,[3][4][5], but the clinical significance of pleural fluid eosinophilia remains unclear. Some early studies have shown that pleural fluid eosinophilia is associated with a decreased risk of a malignant aetiology [1]. However, later studies did not confirm these observations [3][4][5]. Another interesting and unresolved issue is a potential causative relationship between the presence of air and/or blood in the pleural space and pleural fluid eosinophilia [1,[6][7][8].Since pleural fluid eosinophilia is uncommon, our knowledge concerning EPE is based on small series and case reports. The majority of reports published before 1982 have been analysed by ADELMAN et al. [1]. However, the results of the studies published in the subsequent 15 yrs questioned some of the conclusions of their analysis.To re-evaluate some of the important issues concerning EPE, we performed an analysis of a large series of samples of PE in our institution (Dept of Internal Medicine, Pneumology and Allergology Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland). The specific goals of our study were to: 1) assess the relative incidence and aetiology of EPE; 2) search for the predictors of malignancy in patients with EPE; and 3) evaluate the relationship between the first and repeated thoracentesis and ple...
Few data exist on respiratory effects of indoor air quality and comfort parameters in the elderly. In the context of the GERIE study, we investigated for the first time the relationships of these factors to respiratory morbidity among elderly people permanently living in nursing homes in seven European countries. 600 elderly people from 50 nursing homes underwent a medical examination and completed a standardised questionnaire. Air quality and comfort parameters were objectively assessed in situ in the nursing home. Mean concentrations of air pollutants did not exceed the existing standards.Forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio was highly significantly related to elevated levels of particles with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of <0.1 µm (PM0.1) (adjusted OR 8.16, 95% CI 2.24-29.3) and nitrogen dioxide (aOR 3.74, 95% CI 1.06-13.1). Excess risks for usual breathlessness and cough were found with elevated PM10 (aOR 1.53 (95% CI 1.15-2.07) and aOR 1.73 (95% CI 1.17-10.3), respectively) and nitrogen dioxide (aOR 1.58 (95% CI 1.15-2.20) and aOR 1.56 (95% CI 1.03-2.41), respectively). Excess risks for wheeze in the past year were found with PM0.1 (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.15-7.02) and for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and exhaled carbon monoxide with formaldehyde (aOR 3.49 (95% CI 1.17-10.3) and aOR 1.25 (95% CI 1.02-1.55), respectively). Breathlessness and cough were associated with higher carbon dioxide. Relative humidity was inversely related to wheeze in the past year and usual cough. Elderly subjects aged ⩾80 years were at higher risk. Pollutant effects were more pronounced in the case of poor ventilation.Even at low levels, indoor air quality affected respiratory health in elderly people permanently living in nursing homes, with frailty increasing with age. The effects were modulated by ventilation.@ERSpublications Poor air quality in European nursing homes impairs respiratory health in the elderly permanently living in them
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is currently one of the most commonly used support methods in hypoxaemic and hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (ARF). With advancing technology and increasing experience, not only are indications for NIV getting broader, but more severe patients are treated with NIV. Depending on disease type and clinical status, NIV can be applied both in the general ward and in high-dependency/intensive care unit settings with different environmental opportunities. However, it is important to remember that patients with ARF are always very fragile with possible high mortality risk. The delay in recognition of unresponsiveness to NIV, progression of respiratory failure or new-onset complications may result in devastating and fatal outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to understand that timely action taken according to monitoring variables is one of the key elements for NIV success. The purpose of this review is to outline basic and advanced monitoring techniques for NIV during an ARF episode.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.