Major advances in understanding the pathogenesis of inherited metabolic disease caused by mitochondrial DNA mutations have yet to translate into treatments of proven efficacy. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy is the most common mitochondrial DNA disorder causing irreversible blindness in young adult life. Anecdotal reports support the use of idebenone in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, but this has not been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. We conducted a 24-week multi-centre double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 85 patients with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy due to m.3460G>A, m.11778G>A, and m.14484T>C or mitochondrial DNA mutations. The active drug was idebenone 900 mg/day. The primary end-point was the best recovery in visual acuity. The main secondary end-point was the change in best visual acuity. Other secondary end-points were changes in visual acuity of the best eye at baseline and changes in visual acuity for both eyes in each patient. Colour-contrast sensitivity and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness were measured in subgroups. Idebenone was safe and well tolerated. The primary end-point did not reach statistical significance in the intention to treat population. However, post hoc interaction analysis showed a different response to idebenone in patients with discordant visual acuities at baseline; in these patients, all secondary end-points were significantly different between the idebenone and placebo groups. This first randomized controlled trial in the mitochondrial disorder, Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, provides evidence that patients with discordant visual acuities are the most likely to benefit from idebenone treatment, which is safe and well tolerated.

No abstract

The relationship between a structure (OCT RNFL thickness) and function (SAP sensitivity loss) is the same for patients with AION and glaucoma and can be approximated by a simple linear model. The model may provide a framework for identifying those patients with ganglion cell axons that are malfunctioning but are alive.

In our Midwest retrospective case series of biopsy proven neuro-ophthalmic sarcoidosis, patients were predominately white females with a wide age range. Consideration for the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis should therefore not be limited by age, gender, or race. Optic neuropathy was the most common manifestation, typically presenting with optic disc edema and severe visual loss. No light perception vision was relatively common and should be considered a "red flag" for the diagnosis. Contrast cranial MRI frequently shows pathologic enhancement of the visual pathway. Serum angiotensin converting enzyme and chest radiography had relatively poor sensitivity for detecting biopsy proven disease in our study and therefore additional testing for tissue diagnosis might still be necessary for extrapulmonary neuro-ophthalmic sarcoidosis. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy but some patients may require additional immunosuppressive therapy.

To our knowledge this represents only the third case of interferon beta-1a associated cotton wool patches and the first in the English-language ophthalmic literature. Unlike interferon alpha therapy, interferon beta 1-a retinopathy is presumed to be extremely rare and more common etiologies for cotton wool spots should be excluded in these patients. Given this limited number of cases versus the relatively frequent use of interferon beta-1a in the management of multiple sclerosis, no conclusions regarding causality or screening can be made but the issue probably deserves further study.