To identify the clinical factors associated with acute rejection (AR) in the first year after heart transplantation (HT), we analysed 112 patients. All patients received OKT3 and standard triple-drug therapy. We analysed the following variables to determine their relationship with AR: age and gender, panel-reactive antibodies, HLA-DR mismatch, use of Sandimmune vs Neoral, diltiazem administration, and cyclosporine levels in week 2 and months 1, 2, and 3 after HT. Fifty-two patients had no AR and 49 had at least one episode. The variables independently associated with absence of AR were diltiazem administration (odds ratio 0.306, confidence limit 0.102-0.921) and cyclosporine level in the first month after HT (odds ratio 0.996, confidence limit 0.992-0.999). Furthermore, a cyclosporine level greater than 362 ng/ml in the first month predicted the absence of AR. In conclusion, a cyclosporine level greater than 362 ng/ml and diltiazem administration in the first month after HT reduce AR during the first year. Both cyclosporine level and diltiazem show a large and independent protective effect.
We studied prospectively 35 elder women aged 65-82 years, with isolated severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, referred for aortic valve surgery. We assessed diastolic function by TEE before and after cardiac surgery, although follow-up data were collected in 26 patients. The examination was performed prior to surgery and 6 months after. The control group consisted of 32 patients referred for TEE. In the preoperative study, the velocities and integrals of the waves in the pulmonary vein flow were similar to the people of their same age, except the A-wave of atrial contraction and the integral of the systolic wave, which were significantly smaller (Control A-wave 26.1 +/- 5.1 vs preoperative A-wave 22.6 +/- 5.6, P = 0.009 and control double product A vel xA dur 2,748 +/- 835 vs preoperative 2,273 +/- 968, P = 0.03; systolic integral 14.6 +/- 3.8 vs 11.3 +/- 4, P = 0.0009). Six months after surgery, the PV flow was similar to the control group except for the wave of atrial contraction, which was significantly smaller but tended to normalization (postoperative A-wave 23.3 +/- 5, P = 0.04 vs control, and postoperative double product A vel x A dur 2460 +/- 893, P = 0.21 vs control). Mitral flow parameters did not change in the preoperative and postoperative period. Left ventricular mass index changed from 166 +/- 54 g/m(2) to 105 +/- 39 g/m(2) (P< 0.0001). The results of this study show that in elderly women with symptomatic severe AS, diastolic function does not change, left ventricular mass reduces, with improvement in symptoms, and the left atrium function, considered by pulmonary vein flow, is preoperative depressed and tends to mild recovery in the postoperative period, suggesting systolic LA failure.
To identify the clinical factors associated with acute rejection (AR) in the first year after heart transplantation (HT), we analysed 112 patients. All patients received OKT3 and standard triple-drug therapy. We analysed the following variables to determine their relationship with AR: age and gender, panel-reactive antibodies, HLA-DR mismatch, use of Sandimmune vs Neoral, diltiazem administration, and cyclosporine levels in week 2 and months 1, 2, and 3 after HT. Fifty-two patients had no AR and 49 had at least one episode. The variables independently associated with absence of AR were diltiazem administration (odds ratio 0.306, confidence limit 0.102-0.921) and cyclosporine level in the first month after HT (odds ratio 0.996, confidence limit 0.992-0.999). Furthermore, a cyclosporine level greater than 362 ng/ml in the first month predicted the absence of AR. In conclusion, a cyclosporine level greater than 362 ng/ml and diltiazem administration in the first month after HT reduce AR during the first year. Both cyclosporine level and diltiazem show a large and independent protective effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.