Many ventilators measure expired tidal volume (VT) without compensation either for the compliance of the ventilator circuit or for variations in the circuit setup. We hypothesized that the exhaled VT measured with a conventional ventilator at the expiratory valve would differ significantly from the exhaled VT measured with a pneumotachometer placed at the endotracheal tube. To investigate this we studied 98 infants and children requiring conventional ventilation. We used linear regression analysis to compare the VT obtained with the pneumotachometer with the ventilator-measured volume. An additional comparison was made between the pneumotachometer volume and a calculated effective VT. For infant circuits (n = 70), our analysis revealed a poor correlation between the expiratory VT measured with the pneumotachometer and the ventilator-measured volume (r(2) = 0.54). Similarly, the expiratory VT measured with the pneumotachometer did not correlate with the calculated effective volume (r(2) = 0.58). For pediatric circuits (n = 28), there was improved correlation between the expiratory VT measured with the pneumotachometer and both the ventilator-measured volume and the calculated effective VT (r(2) = 0.84 and r(2) = 0.85, respectively). The data demonstrate a significant discrepancy between expiratory VT measured at a ventilator and that measured with a pneumotachometer placed at the endotracheal tube in infants. Correcting for the compliance of the ventilator circuit by calculating the effective VT did not alter this discrepancy. In conventionally ventilated infants, exhaled VT should be determined with a pneumotachometer placed at the airway.
The purposes of this study were to quantify the insensible water loss that occurs across the Medtronic Minimax oxygenator and to estimate the resultant rise in fluid sodium concentration.A Carmeda-coated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit connected to a Medtronic Minimax Plus oxygenator was primed with normal saline and attached to a closed reservoir. The gas sweep was randomly assigned to one of three rates: 2, 5, or 10 LPM (liters per minute). Each sweep rate was run in triplicate. The sodium concentration of the circuit was assessed after 12 and 24 hours of each trial. At the end of each 24-hour run, the evaporative loss was calculated. The average insensible water losses were 6.9+/-0.4 ml/h, 16.6+/-1.5 ml/h, and 34.4+/-0.3 ml/h at gas sweep rates of 2, 5, and 10 LPM, respectively (p<0.0001). Daily evaporative water losses for the membrane can be estimated to be 82.7+/-2.2 ml for each 1 LPM of sweep gas flow for a normal saline pump flow of 300 ml/min. In a closed circuit, a faster sweep gas rate is associated with a more rapid rise in sodium concentration (p<0.0001).
This study examines a management strategy for restoring grassland and prairie communities that have become degraded due to high density stands of invasive nitrogen-fixing plants. The novel management applications minimize the use of herbicides and maximize the competitive interactions of native species. The management method includes two seasons of application of organic fertilizer (4-1-4), an initial herbicide (Pasture Gard, Dow Agro) application, and mowing, where mowing was a necessary treatment to control secondary growth in prairie habitats, to control high density patches of Lespedeza (L.) Cuneata, in a completely randomized factorial experiment. The herbicide was effective in reducing L. Cuneate stem density 0 stems/m 2 from an initial 88 stems/m 2 with cover reduced to 0% from 16%. The fertilizer only treatment reduced L. Cuneata percent cover to 6% from initial cover of 16%, but did not reduce the number of stems. The management strategy is an effective first step in restoring a native prairie invaded by a nitrogen-fixing plant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.