Abstract:The Department of Defense, in response to excruciating budget pressures, recurring system integration problems, and the continuing remarkable growth in computer capability and high resolution graphics, has seized on the promise of advanced distributed simulation technologies (including virtual prototyping) as a means for improving efficiency in developing integrated defense system products. From

Abstract. Very few organizations are able to show a "bottom line" impact directly attributable to investments in information technology. While many reasons are postulated for this failure to produce measurable improvements, a large part of the solution appears to be getting the user involved in defining requirements, identifying cost benefits, and implementing reengineered product development processes.This approach was tried and validated for the Integrated Product Development Team (IPDT) on which it was applied. The product was a ground based weapon system. Results of the experiment exceeded expectations. Utilization of the system engineering process was an essential element in making this a successful endeavor.Described herein is the process by which IPDT perspectives were changed, the role of cost benefit analysis, results obtained, and what was learned about transforming a well-established culture.

Timely and reliable information exchange is a hallmark of successful collaborative product development endeavors. The continuing challenge for organizations seeking to improve productivity is how to select and deploy technologies that provide the best return on their investment. This paper documents the process that LMMFC‐D (Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control ‐ Dallas) followed in selecting digital print technology to improve Integrated Product Development Teams (IPDT) performance across several programs. Cost benefit results are included.