No abstract

Dekkera bruxellensis is continuously changing its status in fermentation processes, ranging from a contaminant or spoiling yeast to a microorganism with potential to produce metabolites of biotechnological interest. In spite of that, several major aspects of its physiology are still poorly understood. As an acetogenic yeast, minimal oxygen concentrations are able to drive glucose assimilation to oxidative metabolism, in order to produce biomass and acetate, with consequent low yield in ethanol. In the present study, we used disulfiram to inhibit acetaldehyde dehydrogenase activity to evaluate the influence of cytosolic acetate on cell metabolism. D. bruxellensis was more tolerant to disulfiram than Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the use of different carbon sources revealed that the former yeast might be able to export acetate (or acetyl-CoA) from mitochondria to cytoplasm. Fermentation assays showed that acetaldehyde dehydrogenase inhibition re-oriented yeast central metabolism to increase ethanol production and decrease biomass formation. However, glucose uptake was reduced, which ultimately represents economical loss to the fermentation process. This might be the major challenge for future metabolic engineering enterprises on this yeast.

Dekkera bruxellensis is considered a spoilage yeast in winemaking, brewing and fuel-ethanol production. However, there is growing evidence in the literature of its biotechnological potential. In this work, we surveyed 29 D. bruxellensis isolates from three countries and two different industrial origins (winemaking and fuel-ethanol production) for the metabolization of industrially relevant sugars. The isolates were characterized by the determination of their maximum specific growth rates, and by testing their ability to grow in the presence of 2-deoxy-d-glucose and antimycin A. Great diversity was observed among the isolates, with fuel-ethanol isolates showing overall higher specific growth rates than wine isolates. Preferences for galactose (three wine isolates) and for cellobiose or lactose (some fuel-ethanol isolates) were observed. Fuel-ethanol isolates were less sensitive than wine isolates to glucose catabolite repression (GCR) induction by 2-deoxy-d-glucose. In strictly anaerobic conditions, isolates selected for having high aerobic growth rates were able to ferment glucose, sucrose and cellobiose at fairly high rates without supplementation of casamino acids or yeast extract in the culture medium. The phenotypic diversity found among wine and fuel-ethanol isolates suggests adaptation to these environments. A possible application of some of the GCR-insensitive, fast-growing isolates in industrial processes requiring co-assimilation of different sugars is considered.

In the past few years, the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis has gained much of attention among the so-called non-conventional yeasts for its potential in the biotechnological scenario, especially in fermentative processes. This yeast has been regarded as an important competitor to Saccharomyces cerevisiae in bioethanol production plants in Brazil and several studies have reported its capacity to produce ethanol. However, our current knowledge concerning D. bruxellensis is restricted to its aerobic metabolism, most likely because wine and beer strains cannot grow in full anaerobiosis. Hence, the present work aimed to fulfil a gap regarding the lack of information on the physiology of Dekkera bruxellensis growing in the complete absence of oxygen and the relationship with assimilation of nitrate as nitrogen source. The ethanol strain GDB 248 was fully capable of growing anaerobically and produces ethanol at the same level of S. cerevisiae. The presence of nitrate in the medium increased this capacity. Moreover, nitrate is consumed faster than ammonium and this increased rate coincided with a higher speed of glucose consumption. The profile of gene expression helped us to figure out that even in anaerobiosis, the presence of nitrate drives the yeast cells to an oxidative metabolism that ultimately incremented both biomass and ethanol production. These results finally provide the clues to explain most of the success of this yeast in industrial processes of ethanol production.

No abstract