Background
Intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise 3%–5% of pediatric primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors in Western countries. Though they are related in embryonic origin to gonadal GCTs, which are considered highly treatable with cisplatin‐based chemotherapy regimens, intracranial GCTs vary in malignant potential and sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapy, generally carrying a worse prognosis. Metastases of intracranial GCTs outside of the CNS are rare, indicate a poor prognosis, and their salvage treatment is not well established.
Case
A 15‐year‐old boy presented with bifocal (suprasellar and pineal) intracranial nongerminomatous germ cell tumors of mixed origin. The tumors were treated to full response with a multimodal approach of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection, and adjuvant craniospinal proton radiation. Nine months following treatment completion, the patient presented with an enlarged cervical lymph node determined on excisional biopsy to be a recurrence of pure germinoma from the primary tumors. Salvage treatment involved high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation; however, the patient denied further treatment prior to planned focal radiotherapy. Thirty months post‐treatment, the patient is well with no evidence of recurrence.
Conclusion
This case demonstrated the successful salvage treatment of an extraneural recurrence of an intracranial GCT using surgical resection and a high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem‐cell transplantation regimen, highlighting the unique factors which led to the selection of this regimen.
39 Background: Pelvic radiation and myelosuppressive chemotherapy can lead to lymphopenia during the course of preoperative chemoradiation when treating rectal cancer. Lymphopenia during chemoradiation has been associated with higher risks of recurrence in other cancers, possibly due to decreased immunosurveillance. The effect in rectal cancer is not well described. We hypothesize that high-grade lymphopenia is associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation. Methods: All patients treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemoradiation between 2013 and 2019 were reviewed (n = 99). The study was limited to patients with Stage II – IV (AJCC 8th edition) rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were excluded if they had prior systemic therapy (n = 13) or if lymphocyte data was unavailable (n = 30). Lymphopenia which arose during or within 30 days of completion of chemoradiation was graded by the CTCAE v.4.0. Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) scores, indicators of pathologic response, were calculated for each surgical patient. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate PFS and OS. Two-tailed t-tests (a=0.05) were used to detect differences between subgroups. Results: Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Grade 2 (G2) or higher lymphopenia occurred in 43 (76.8%) patients (G2 = 22, G3 = 20, G4 = 1). In patients with G2 vs G3-4 lymphopenia, there were no differences in baseline, treatment, or demographic characteristics. The median PFS for these patients was 20.0 months. Patients with G3-4 lymphopenia had significantly worse 2-year PFS compared to those with G2 lymphopenia (83.3% vs 59.3% p = 0.03). The two-year OS did not differ between groups (100% vs 60.3%, p = 0.10). Lymphocyte nadir did not correlate with pathologic response, as measured by the NAR score (r = -0.28, p = 0.07). Conclusions: In this study, G3-4 lymphopenia was associated with worse PFS in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, despite a small sample size. The prognostic implications of lymphopenia in rectal cancer should be confirmed in larger cohorts and the underlying mechanisms explored.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.