Aim: Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) may lead to significant morbidity and mortality, yet the recommended antimicrobials have not changed for many years. We aimed to optimise EOS treatment by examining EOS pathogens, resistance rates and resistance risk factors.Methods: A retrospective, nationwide cohort study analysing 2010-2015 EOS data in Israel. Results:The 21 participating centres constitute 92% of the total birth cohort (around 180 000 live births/year). Of 549 EOS neonates (0.57/1000 live births), 306 (56%) and 243 (44%) were full-term and preterm, respectively (0.35 vs. 2.94 per/1000 live births). Gram-negative pathogens predominated, especially in preterms. Escherichia coli and Streptococcus agalactiae were most common pathogens (0.2 and 0.19 per 1000 live births, respectively). In 277 Gram-negatives, 16%, 14%, 8% and 3% were gentamicinresistant, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, gentamicin-resistant and ESBL-positive, and amikacin-resistant, respectively; preterms had higher resistance rates. No risk factors for antimicrobial resistance were identified. Mortality was reported in 21% of Gram-negative EOS versus 7% of Gram-positive EOS [OR 3.4 (95% CI 1.8-6.2), p < 0.01].Conclusion: In this nationwide study, EOS was caused predominantly by Gram-negatives, with high gentamicin resistance and ESBL phenotype rates, without identifiable resistance risk factors. As EOS is life-threatening, modification of empiric therapy for amikacin-based regimens should be considered, mainly in preterms.

Preterm infants can control iron levels by regulating hepcidin and decreasing erythropoietin. This ability varies with postnatal age.

No abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In the absence of universal screening for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection, the aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of a targeted screening protocol based on maternal and neonatal risk indicators. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The medical records of 2,623 neonates born in our maternal hospital between June 2016 and December 2018 and screened for cCMV infection were reviewed. Among those of the included neonates, the records of 380 CMV-negative and 19 CMV-positive neonates were randomly assigned to obtain additional comparative data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, a total of 63 neonates were identified as positive for cCMV, comprising 0.2% of the total birth cohort (63/28,982) and 2.4% of all neonates screened for cCMV (63/2,623). The comparative data analysis showed that suspected or confirmed CMV infection during pregnancy, maternal age, and maternal diabetes mellitus were found to be significantly associated with a positive cCMV diagnosis. Although symmetric small for gestational age and hearing screening failure contributed to the detection of some of the CMV-positive infants, these factors were not specific to this group. The results of the logistic regression model showed that the only factor that was significantly associated with an increased risk for a cCMV diagnosis was maternal serology suspected of CMV infection during pregnancy, with a regression coefficient estimate of 2.657 (adjusted <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A targeted neonatal screening protocol based on multiple maternal and neonatal risk indicators is feasible but provides limited information. Our study emphasizes the importance of universal neonatal screening for the detection of neonates with cCMV.