Since the advent of EEG recordings, sleep spindles have been identified as hallmarks of non-REM sleep. Despite a broad general understanding of mechanisms of spindle generation gleaned from animal studies, the mechanisms underlying certain features of spindles in the human brain, such as “global” versus “local” spindles, are largely unknown. Neither the topography nor the morphology of sleep spindles remains constant throughout the lifespan. It is likely that changes in spindle phenomenology during development and aging are the result of dramatic changes in brain structure and function. Across various developmental windows, spindle activity is correlated with general cognitive aptitude, learning, and memory; however, these correlations vary in strength, and even direction, depending on age and metrics used. Understanding these differences across the lifespan should further clarify how these oscillations are generated and their function under a variety of circumstances. We discuss these issues, and their translational implications for human cognitive function. Because sleep spindles are similarly affected in disorders of neurodevelopment (such as schizophrenia) and during aging (such as neurodegenerative conditions), both types of disorders may benefit from therapies based on a better understanding of spindle function.

Two long-standing questions in neuroscience are how sleep promotes brain plasticity and why some forms of plasticity occur preferentially during sleep vs. wake. Establishing causal relationships between specific features of sleep (e.g., network oscillations) and sleep-dependent plasticity has been difficult. Here we demonstrate that presentation of a novel visual stimulus (a single oriented grating) causes immediate, instructive changes in the firing of mouse lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) neurons, leading to increased firing-rate responses to the presented stimulus orientation (relative to other orientations). However, stimulus presentation alone does not affect primary visual cortex (V1) neurons, which show response changes only after a period of subsequent sleep. During poststimulus nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, LGN neuron overall spike-field coherence (SFC) with V1 delta (0.5-4 Hz) and spindle (7-15 Hz) oscillations increased, with neurons most responsive to the presented stimulus showing greater SFC. To test whether coherent communication between LGN and V1 was essential for cortical plasticity, we first tested the role of layer 6 corticothalamic (CT) V1 neurons in coherent firing within the LGN-V1 network. We found that rhythmic optogenetic activation of CT V1 neurons dramatically induced coherent firing in LGN neurons and, to a lesser extent, in V1 neurons in the other cortical layers. Optogenetic interference with CT feedback to LGN during poststimulus NREM sleep (but not REM or wake) disrupts coherence between LGN and V1 and also blocks sleep-dependent response changes in V1. We conclude that NREM oscillations relay information regarding prior sensory experience between the thalamus and cortex to promote cortical plasticity. (5), and electrophysiological (2, 6-8) evidence supports the idea that following novel sensory experiences, sleep can promote cortical plasticity. The sleep-dependent mechanisms driving these changes have remained elusive. Sleep-associated changes in network activity (1, 6, 7, 9, 10), neuromodulator tone (11), transcription (4), translation (4), and protein phosphorylation (2, 3) have all been correlated with cortical plasticity following novel experiences (12). In recent years, neuroscientists have speculated that the high-amplitude, low-frequency thalamocortical oscillations that characterize nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep play a critical role in promoting sensory cortical plasticity and learning (12). While it has been hypothesized that such NREM oscillations promote general synaptic "downscaling" (13), converging data suggest that they could instead promote synaptic strengthening (5-7, 9). While rhythmic stimulation of the cortex at frequencies meant to mimic NREM oscillations (1-2 Hz) is sufficient to promote cortical plasticity and learning (9, 10), it is unclear whether naturally occurring oscillations are necessary for sleep-dependent processes. Another critical question is whether NREM oscillations play an instructive role in experience-initiated plasticity-i.e....

Recent studies suggest that sleep differentially alters the activity of cortical neurons based on firing rates during preceding wake—increasing the firing rates of sparsely firing neurons and decreasing those of faster firing neurons. Because sparsely firing cortical neurons may play a specialized role in sensory processing, sleep could facilitate sensory function via selective actions on sparsely firing neurons. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed longitudinal electrophysiological recordings of primary visual cortex (V1) neurons across a novel visual experience which induces V1 plasticity (or a control experience which does not), and a period of subsequent ad lib sleep or partial sleep deprivation. We find that across a day of ad lib sleep, spontaneous and visually-evoked firing rates are selectively augmented in sparsely firing V1 neurons. These sparsely firing neurons are more highly visually responsive, and show greater orientation selectivity than their high firing rate neighbors. They also tend to be “soloists” instead of “choristers”—showing relatively weak coupling of firing to V1 population activity. These population-specific changes in firing rate are blocked by sleep disruption either early or late in the day, and appear to be brought about by increases in neuronal firing rates across bouts of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Following a patterned visual experience that induces orientation-selective response potentiation (OSRP) in V1, sparsely firing and weakly population-coupled neurons show the highest level of sleep-dependent response plasticity. Across a day of ad lib sleep, population coupling strength increases selectively for sparsely firing neurons—this effect is also disrupted by sleep deprivation. Together, these data suggest that sleep may optimize sensory function by augmenting the functional connectivity and firing rate of highly responsive and stimulus-selective cortical neurons, while simultaneously reducing noise in the network by decreasing the activity of less selective, faster-firing neurons.

The current data suggest that following novel visual experience, potentiation of a subset of V1 synapses occurs across periods of sleep. This finding cannot be explained parsimoniously by SHY.

Recent data have shown that sleep plays a beneficial role for cognitive functions such as declarative memory consolidation and perceptual learning. In this article, we review recent findings on the role of sleep in promoting adaptive visual response changes in the lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex following novel visual experiences. We discuss these findings in the context of what is currently known about how sleep affects the activity and function of thalamocortical circuits and current hypotheses regarding how sleep facilitates synaptic plasticity.