SUMMARY: Vertebral compression fractures are very common, especially in the elderly. Benign osteoporotic and malignant vertebral compression fractures have extremely different management and prognostic implications. Although there is an overlap in appearances, characteristic imaging features can aid in the distinction between these 2 types of compression fractures. The aim of this review is to characterize the imaging features of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures seen with CT, PET, SPECT, and MR imaging.ABBREVIATIONS: SI ϭ signal intensity; SUV ϭ standard uptake value; VCF ϭ vertebral compression fracture

This Viewpoint reviews the policies, challenges, and ethics of allowing visitors of women while laboring in a hospital from the perspective of the woman, the visitor, the hospital staff, the community, and the infant.

Background Direct comparison of nerve autograft, conduit, and allograft outcomes in digital nerve injuries is limited. This study aims to compare the outcomes of nerve autografts, allografts, and conduits relative to primary repair (PR) through a systematic review. Methods A review of literature related to digital nerve gap repairs was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE. Included articles were human clinical studies on digital nerve injuries repaired with nerve autograft, allograft, bovine collagen conduit, or PR. Patient characteristics, injury details, and complications were collected. Greater than 6-month outcomes included static 2-point discrimination, the British Medical Research Council Scale, or Semmes-Weinstein. Results Four autograft, 4 allograft, 5 conduit, and 7 PR publications were included. Allografts had the most repairs (100%) with static 2-point discrimination less than 15 mm, followed by autografts (88%), conduits (72%), and PR (63%). In British Medical Research Council Scale results, autografts (88%) and allografts (86%) were similar for patients with at least S3+ sensibility, compared to conduit (77%) and PR (39%). For Semmes-Weinstein, autografts demonstrated 93% normal sensation or diminished light touch, compared to allografts (71%), PR (70%), or conduits (46%). Conduits had the highest complication rate (10.9%), followed by autografts (5.7%), allografts (3.0%), and PRs (0.4%). Conclusions Although a randomized clinical trial would provide strongest evidence of superiority, this review presents the highest percentage of patients with normal to near normal sensory recovery in allograft and autograft repairs with low rates of complications. Nerve conduit studies reported a higher rate of incomplete recovery of sensation and complications.

Read each question and circle the answer that best describes how you feel.

Introduction: Soft-tissue reconstruction of the scalp has traditionally been challenging in oncologic patients. Invasive tumors can compromise the calvarium, necessitating alloplastic cranioplasty. Titanium mesh is the most common alloplastic material, but concerns of compromise of soft-tissue coverage have introduced hesitancy in utilization. The authors aim to identify prognostic factors associated with free-flap failure in the context of underlying titanium mesh in scalp oncology patients. Methods: A retrospective review (2010–2018) was conducted at a single center examining all patients following oncologic scalp resection who underwent titanium mesh cranioplasty with free-flap reconstruction following surgical excision. Patient demographics, comorbidities, ancillary oncological treatment information were collected. Operative data including flap type, post-operative complications including partial and complete flap failure were collected. Results: A total of 16 patients with 18 concomitant mesh cranioplasty and free-flap reconstructions were identified. The majority of patients were male (68.8%), with an average age of 70.5 years. Free-flap reconstruction included 15 ALT flaps (83.3%), 2 latissimus flaps (11.1%), and one radial forearm flap (5.5%). There were three total flap losses in two patients. Patient demographics and comorbidities were not significant prognostic factors. Additionally, post-operative radiation therapy, ancillary chemotherapy, oncological histology, tumor recurrence, and flap type were not found to be significant. Pre-operative radiotherapy was significantly associated with flap failure (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Pre-operative radiotherapy may pose a significant risk for free-flap failure in oncologic patients undergoing scalp reconstruction following mesh cranioplasty. Awareness of associated risk factors ensures better pre-operative counseling and success of these reconstructive modalities and timing of pre-adjuvant treatment.