Introduction. Endometriomas are present in up to 44% of all women with endometriosis and have a detrimental effect on fertility. However, it is controversial whether endometriomas should be surgically removed before assisted reproduction technology. Our purpose was to evaluate whether surgical stripping of endometriomas in subfertile women improves the chance of a live birth. Secondary outcomes were impact on ovarian reserve and pain. Material and methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with results reported in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. A summary of findings table was developed using GRADE. We searched Medline and Embase. Two reviewers performed the screening. Results. Of 686 manuscripts, we included one randomized controlled trial and nine retrospective cohort studies, mostly of low quality. The odds ratio for live birth after surgery [compared with conservative management before in vitro fertilization (IVF)/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)] was 0.87 (95% CI 0.64-1.18, six studies, I 2 = 3%; ⨁◯◯◯, VERY LOW quality). The mean difference of antral follicle count was À2.09 (95% CI À4.84 to 0.67, four studies). No difference was observed regarding antral follicle count between the two groups (MD À2.09, 95% CI À4.84 to 0.67, four studies, ⨁◯◯◯, VERY LOW quality). Pain outcome was not reported in the included studies. Conclusion. The very low quality evidence suggests no difference in odds ratio of live birth between women who underwent surgery for endometriomas before IVF/ICSI compared with conservative management. Further high quality studies are needed, but due to a lack of convincing evidence favoring surgery, we recommend considering conservative treatment if the only indication is subfertility.

No abstract

The increasing proportion of elderly Americans has brought about an anticipation of 50% rise in prolapse surgeries by 2050. It is anticipated that 25% to 40% of patients undergoing surgeries will develop de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prolapse repair. The Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair with Midurethral Sling (OPUS) found a 36% reduction in the risk for de novo SUI, but also demonstrated increased risk of bladder perforations, urinary tract infections, and incomplete bladder emptying symptoms (N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2358-2367. As a result, pelvic reconstructive surgeons often vary their approach toward prophylactic MUS at the time of vaginal prolapse repair (VPR). Although a cost-effectiveness analysis found universal MUS placement to be the most cost-effective strategy over both selective and staged strategies (J Urol. 2013;190:1306-1312, this analysis did not include an arm for the less-costly option of using a selective approach via a prolapse-reduced cough stress test (CST). In addition, Richardson analysis of patients undergoing sacral colpopexy lacks generalizability for VPR surgeries (which account for two thirds of all prolapse surgeries). The manuscript described here therefore tested the cost-effectiveness of 3 generalizable MUS utilization strategies for preventing de novo SUI within 1 year post-VPR.Three approaches were compared: (1) staged strategy performing VPR with later MUS placement only for de novo SUI;(2) universal sling placement at the time of VPR; and (3) selective sling placement with MUS at the time of VPR when occult SUI was observed at the time of preoperative prolapse-reduced CST. A representative population of women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (at least stage II) was modeled. Included in the VPR model was colpocleisis, apical suspension, or anterior colporrhaphy, with or without hysterectomy. The base assumption was that all VPRs were uncomplicated and anatomically successful. Subsequent treatment pathways were formed based on the 3 aforementioned options if de novo SUI was to occur.A 2017 systematic review by van der Ploeg was used for obtaining literature to gain point estimates concerning the risk for postoperative SUI (Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1029-1038). The search was performed via PubMed through January 2017, and exclusionary criteria were as follows: studies examining urodynamics preoperatively, abdominal prolapse repairs, duplicate studies, and studies lacking clear definitions for VPR, MUS, or SUI. Using data from 3 previous studies, for a selective MUS, the authors estimated the rate of de novo SUI after VPR with a negative preoperative CST to be 33.6%. The authors determined the existence of 4 possible adverse outcomes following MUS: (1) persistent SUI, (2) sling lysis required for voiding dysfunction, (3) mesh exposure requiring excision, and (4) anticholinergic medications required for de novo overactive bladder. Information on costs was gathered Physician Fee Schedules from the 2020 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Incr...