This article concerns people who have developed a substance use disorder (SUD) and sought treatment. SUD is understood as a biopsychosocial disorder. People who want to stop using substances or wish to increase their wellbeing while using substances need to undergo a recovery process. We conducted qualitative interviews with 11 former patients four years after discharge from inpatient SUD treatment in the Tyrili Foundation to explore their experiences and reflections on SUD and the recovery process. The findings indicated that recovery processes are complex, and feelings of wellbeing and success vary over time. Several interrelated aspects of life were essential for seeking a better life: Understanding own substance use; Feeling safe; Understanding the impact of close relationships; and Perceptions of participation and belonging. The informants emphasised the need for access to professional and social support during the recovery process, which, for some, will last for many years. Receiving such support is not understood as a defeat, and each person's resources and vulnerabilities should be recognized and acknowledged. SUD and recovery should be understood using the same coherent approach-as an interplay between biological and psychological factors and social, political and cultural contexts.

No abstract

Background and aim: Substance use disorder (SUD) is multifactorial, complex, and involves the severe problematic use of alcohol, prescription drugs, and other substances. People with SUD have long histories of perceived stigma, marginalisation, exclusion, social isolation, and shame. Moreover, patients with SUD are often treated as untrustworthy and incapable of actively participating in their treatment planning, even by healthcare and social services workers. Methods: Through in-depth interviews with former patients who have undergone SUD treatment, we explored their reflections on the treatment content. Interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed that some informants experienced aspects of the treatment as valuable, whereas others considered the same treatment useless or harmful. Results: Essential aspects of treatment were developing self-esteem and optimism about the future, developing strategies for coping with stress and challenging emotions and situations, developing relationships with family and friends, and preparing for life after inpatient treatment. Relationships with staff were described as crucial in all parts of the treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, we suggest that a transition to a more collaborative treatment philosophy would be ethically and professionally valuable for providing support and treatment and enhancing patients’ perceptions of empowerment, inclusion, participation, and well-being on their terms, in cooperation with supportive others.

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the narratives of former substance use disorder (SUD) inpatients about substance use after their discharge from long-term SUD treatment in 2017. Method: We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 11 former inpatients of SUD treatment. The data were analysed using a qualitative, thematic analysis model. Findings: During the analysis, two main themes emerged pertaining to participant reflections on substance use – their experience of non-problematic substance use (that is, substance use without declining into pre-treatment levels of misuse behaviours) and problematic substance use (that is, substance use associated with destructive patterns). All participants except one had engaged in substance use after their discharge three to four years ago. The commonly used substance was alcohol, which also appeared to be the most common substance for which there was consensus among the informants regarding non-problematic use. Conclusions: Most of the participants continued to use substances in some way, and some reported that such use did not affect them negatively. Healthcare providers and therapists in SUD treatment should avoid defining a relapse or failed treatment outcome in concrete terms. What is perceived as an actual relapse or a failed treatment outcome is highly subjective. Furthermore, complete sobriety might not necessarily be the best or the only way to measure the SUD treatment stay. An improvement in the quality of life and well-being, even when core symptoms are still present, may be considered a successful treatment outcome.