The goal of this study was to ascertain why patients are maintained on conventional antipsychotics and whether the risks/benefits and alternative treatments with novel antipsychotics are discussed with these patients. We reviewed the charts of 117 outpatients maintained on conventional antipsychotics at three New York hospitals: Hutchings Psychiatric Center (HPC), Syracuse Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SVA), and the Continuing Day Treatment Program (CDT). The major reasons for maintaining patients on conventional antipsychotics were good response (50%), patient choice (45%), and physician choice (36%). Despite the high incidence of tardive dyskinesia at all three hospitals (range: 12%-50%), physicians often did not discuss the risks/benefits of continuing conventional antipsychotics with the patients. The treating psychiatrist discussed alternative treatments with 37% of patients at SVA, 58% at HPC, and 68% at CDT (P = 0.066, df = 2, Pearson chi(2) test). For patients who are receiving any antipsychotic therapy, discussions about the risks/benefits of treatments are integral for optimal treatment and medicolegal purposes.

No abstract

The medical records of 110 patients receiving conventional antipsychotics at two geographically distinct Veterans Administration hospitals (Syracuse, New York, and Omaha, Nebraska) were reviewed. The most common reasons for continuation of conventional antipsychotics were good response and patient or physician choice. Frequently, physicians did not discuss the reasons for continuing conventional antipsychotics or the availability of alternative therapies with their patients. Geographic differences in physicians' prescribing practices of conventional antipsychotics were apparent.