Background and Purpose: Remote beam output audits, which independently measure an institution’s machine calibration, are a common component of independent radiotherapy peer review. This work reviews the results and trends of these audit results across several organisations and geographical regions. Materials and Methods: Beam output audit results from the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Services, International Atomic Energy Agency, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, and Radiation Dosimetry Services were evaluated from 2010 to the present. The rate of audit results outside a +/−5% tolerance was evaluated for photon and electron beams as a function of the year of irradiation and nominal beam energy. Additionally, examples of confirmed calibration errors were examined to provide guidance to clinical physicists and auditing bodies. Results: Of the 210,167 audit results, 1323 (0.63%) were outside of tolerance. There was a clear trend of improved audit performance for more recent dates, and while all photon energies generally showed uniform rates of results out of tolerance, low (6 MeV) and high (≥18 MeV) energy electron beams showed significantly elevated rates. Twenty nine confirmed calibration errors were explored and attributed to a range of issues, such as equipment failures, errors in setup, and errors in performing the clinical reference calibration. Forty-two percent of these confirmed errors were detected during ongoing periodic monitoring, and not at the time of the first audit of the machine. Conclusions: Remote beam output audits have identified, and continue to identify, numerous and often substantial beam calibration errors.
When imaging studies (e.g. CT) are used to quantify morphological changes in an anatomical structure, it is necessary to understand the extent and source of motion which can give imaging artifacts (e.g. blurring or local distortion). The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of esophageal motion due to cardiac motion. We used retrospective electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography images for this study. The anatomic region from the carina to the bottom of the heart was taken at deep-inspiration breath hold with the patients' arms raised above their shoulders, in a position similar to that used for radiation therapy. The esophagus was delineated on the diastolic phase of cardiac motion, and deformable registration was used to sequentially deform the images in nearest-neighbor phases among the 10 cardiac phases, starting from the diastolic phase. Using the 10 deformation fields generated from the deformable registration, the magnitude of the extreme displacements was then calculated for each voxel, and the mean and maximum displacement was calculated for each computed tomography slice for each patient. The average maximum esophageal displacement due to cardiac motion for all patients was 5.8 mm (standard deviation: 1.6 mm, maximum: 10.0 mm) in the transverse direction. For 21 of 26 patients, the largest esophageal motion was found in the inferior region of the heart; for the other patients, esophageal motion was approximately independent of superior-inferior position. The esophagus motion was larger at cardiac phases where the electrocardiogram R-wave occurs. In conclusion, the magnitude of esophageal motion near the heart due to cardiac motion is similar to that due to other sources of motion, including respiratory motion and intra-fraction motion. A larger cardiac motion will result into larger esophagus motion in a cardiac cycle.
Technical advances and pioneering surgeons have established neuroendoscopy as an accepted diagnostic and therapeutic tool. The clinical indications for endoscopy, variety of operative techniques and number of endoscopic surgeons continue to increase steadily. However, there are fundamental limits to the scope of freehand endoscopy principally governed by the need for direct vision of anatomical and pathological structures. In addition, whilst the expert neuroendoscopist is only occasionally disorientated by complex distorted anatomy, the rising number of novices are likely to be mislead relatively often. We report the integration of neuroendoscopy with an optical neuronavigation system to provide interactive image-guided neuroendoscopy. This combination both removes the constraining requirement for direct vision and provides accurate localisation to guide the surgeon during surgery. We describe the clinical application of this method to two cases where image-guided endoscopy was essential to the safe completion of the procedure.
Figure 2 Meanwhile, wireless capsule video endoscopy was carried out to confirm the diagnosis in this patient, owing to the high risk of the intervention. Surprisingly, the wall of the small intestine in the ascending duodenum had been replaced by the Dacron prosthesis, producing the imaging appearance shown here. This unexpected finding was confirmed during open abdominal surgery. Figure 1A 66-year-old man with a history of aortobifemoral bypass 5 years previously was admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain and fever. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was carried out, revealing the presence of gas involving the aortic prosthesis, and a large retroperitoneal abscess. Antibiotic therapy was initiated, and the abscess was drained under radiographic control. The patient was scheduled for surgical intervention 48 h later, with a suspicion of aortic-enteric fissuration. Images in Focus 938This document was downloaded for personal use only. Unauthorized distribution is strictly prohibited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.