20Small non-coding RNAs regulate multiple aspects of development including germ cell 21 development. The microRNA pathway genes Dicer, Drosha and Pasha have been shown to 22 regulate oocyte meiotic maturation in C. elegans. However, Dicer controls oocyte meiotic 23 maturation through endo-siRNAs, rather than microRNAs. A repertoire of Drosha-dependent 24 oocyte-expressed microRNAs were identified which regulate various aspects of oogenesis but 25 not oocyte meiotic maturation. These data lead to the following models: (a) microRNAs function 26 redundantly to regulate oocyte meiotic maturation, (b) Drosha and microRNAs function germline 27 non-autonomously to regulate meiotic maturation. We investigated these models and observed 28 that Drosha regulates oocyte meiotic maturation in a germline non-autonomous manner. 29Additionally, we uncovered a role for Drosha in regulating pachytene progression and oocyte 30 development in a germline autonomous manner through miR-35 family and miR-51 respectively. 31Interestingly we also find that though Drosha-dependent oocyte-expressed microRNAs, miR-61 32 and miR-72, are sufficient to regulate pachytene progression and oocyte development 33 respectively, they are generated in a germline non-autonomous manner. Collectively these data 34 reveal a Drosha-dependent microRNA circuit, which coordinates oocyte development germline 35 autonomously as well as through soma-germline communication.

No abstract

The fidelity of a signaling pathway depends on its tight regulation in space and time. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) controls wide-ranging cellular processes to promote organismal development and tissue homeostasis. ERK activation depends on a reversible dual phosphorylation on the TEY motif in its active site by ERK kinase (MEK) and dephosphorylation by DUSPs (dual specificity phosphatases). LIP-1, a DUSP6/7 homolog, was proposed to function as an ERK (MPK-1) DUSP in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline primarily because of its phenotype, which morphologically mimics that of a RAS/let-60 gain-of-function mutant (i.e., small oocyte phenotype). Our investigations, however, reveal that loss of lip-1 does not lead to an increase in MPK-1 activity in vivo. Instead, we show that loss of lip-1 leads to 1) a decrease in MPK-1 phosphorylation, 2) lower MPK-1 substrate phosphorylation, 3) phenocopy of mpk-1 reduction-of-function (rather than gain-of-function) allele, and 4) a failure to rescue mpk-1–dependent germline or fertility defects. Moreover, using diverse genetic mutants, we show that the small oocyte phenotype does not correlate with increased ectopic MPK-1 activity and that ectopic increase in MPK-1 phosphorylation does not necessarily result in a small oocyte phenotype. Together, these data demonstrate that LIP-1 does not function as an MPK-1 DUSP in the C. elegans germline. Our results caution against overinterpretation of the mechanistic underpinnings of orthologous phenotypes, since they may be a result of independent mechanisms, and provide a framework for characterizing the distinct molecular targets through which LIP-1 may mediate its several germline functions.

KRAS/ERK pathway phosphorylates DICER1, causing its nuclear translocation, and phosphomimetic Dicer1 contributes to tumorigenesis in mice. Mechanisms through which phospho-DICER1 regulates tumor progression remain undefined. While DICER1 canonically regulates microRNAs (miRNA) and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), we found that phosphorylated nuclear DICER1 (phospho–nuclear DICER1) promotes late-stage tumor progression in mice with oncogenic Kras , independent of miRNAs and EMT. Instead, we observe that the murine AT2 tumor cells exhibit altered chromatin compaction, and cells from disorganized advanced tumors, but not localized tumors, express gastric genes. Collectively, this results in subpopulations of tumor cells transitioning from a restricted alveolar to a broader endodermal lineage state. In human LUADs, we observed expression of phospho–nuclear DICER1 in advanced tumors together with the expression of gastric genes. We define a multimeric chromatin-DICER1 complex composed of the Mediator complex subunit 12, CBX1, MACROH2A.1, and transcriptional regulators supporting the model that phospho–nuclear DICER1 leads to lineage reprogramming of AT2 tumor cells to mediate lung cancer progression.

DICER1 controls micro(mi)RNA-mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to regulate tumorigenesis of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs). We discovered that DICER1 is phosphorylated by ERK and nuclear translocated and phospho-DICER1 contributes to tumorigenesis. Mechanisms through which phospho-DICER1 regulates tumor progression remain undefined. We show that phospho-nuclear DICER1 associates with invasive human LUADs with oncogenic KRAS mutations and promotes late-stage tumor progression in mice with oncogenic Kras mutations. Surprisingly, phosphomimetic DICER1 regulates LUAD progression independent of miRNAs and EMT. Integrating single-cell RNA sequencing, fluorescent in situ RNA hybridization, immunofluorescence, and ATAC-sequencing, in mice, we discovered that phosphomimetic DICER1 generates an open chromatin state in the lung tumor alveolar cells leading to expression of gastrointestinal genes and altered AT2 cell identity. Strikingly, we also observe the gastric gene signature in human LUADs with phospho-DICER1 and KRAS mutations. We propose that phosphorylated nuclear DICER1 regulates chromatin remodeling leading to tumor cell reprogramming which drives lung cancer progression.