Time trends in the prevalence of asthma, family history of asthma and atopy in Roman schoolchildren were assessed. The study population consisted of all children (aged 6–14 yrs) attending two primary schools in Rome, situated in urban areas that differed markedly in socioeconomic conditions and environmental pollution. Three questionnaire-based surveys were conducted in 1974, 1992 and 1998 in 2,259, 1,229 and 1,139 children. The prevalence of asthma in males and females increased significantly during 1974–1992 and remained stable from 1992–1998. In age groups born in the subsequent 4-yr periods it increased almost linearly, for children born from 1962–1965 to 1982–1985 (4.4%–12.5%), and remained remarkably stable in children born after 1985. Because the prevalence of asthma had a steeper trend in males than in females (approximately 0.55%·yr−1versus0.25%·yr−1), the male:female asthma ratio increased (1:38 in 1974; 1:84 in 1992 and 1:62 in 1998). No single environmental factor, including area of residence, seemed to influence the prevalence of asthma. Family history of asthma and atopy also increased steadily (0.72%·yr−1and 0.30%·yr−1respectively) more than doubling during the 24-yr study period. The strong relationship between asthma and a family history of atopy not only persisted but also strengthened over time (23.3% of asthmatic children belonged to families with atopic illnesses in 1974 but 44.2% in 1998). The environmental factors that might explain the almost three-fold rise in childhood asthma between 1974 and 1992 remain unknown but the genetic background of the disease has presumably remained unchanged since the early 1970s. The fact that the prevalence of asthma increased no further during the past 6 yrs suggests that the progressive induction of asthma symptoms in genetically predisposed subjects is a self-limiting process that has probably come to an end in the authors' study area.
To evaluate the clinical usefulness and tolerability of an oral jaw-positioning appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children, we studied 32 patients (mean age, 7.1 +/- 2.6 yr; 20 males) with symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea, malocclusion, and a baseline apnea index > 1 event/h. A group of 19 subjects was randomly assigned to a 6-mo trial of an oral appliance; the remainder acted as control subjects. At baseline and after the trial all patients underwent physical examination, a standard polysomnography, and orthodontic assessment. A modified version of the Brouillette questionnaire related to obstructive sleep apnea symptoms was administered to parents before and after the trial and a clinical score was calculated. Of the 32 subjects enrolled, 4 treated subjects and 5 control subjects were lost to follow-up. Polysomnography after the trial showed that treated subjects all had significantly lower apnea index (p < 0.001) and hypopnea index values (p < 0.001) than before the trial, whereas in untreated control subjects these values remained almost unchanged. Clinical assessment before and after treatment showed that in 7 of the 14 subjects (50%) the oral appliance had reduced (a fall of at least 2 points in the respiratory score) and in 7 had resolved the main respiratory symptoms, whereas untreated patients continued to have symptoms. In conclusion, treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with an oral appliance in children with malocclusion is effective and well tolerated.
Asthmatic bronchial inflammation is associated with increased nitric oxide concentrations in exhaled air (eNO). Recent data suggest that this effect arises from atopy. Our aim in this study was to find out whether atopy and sensitization to particular allergens influences eNO levels. A total of 213 subjects (41 asthmatics and 172 controls) (96 boys and 117 girls, 7.3-14 years of age) were studied. Parents completed a questionnaire that sought information on their children's respiratory symptoms and exposure to tobacco smoke. Subjects underwent skin-prick tests for the following common allergens: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dpt), cat fur, Aspergillus fumigatus, Alternaria tenuis, mixed grass, mixed tree pollen, Parietaria officinalis, egg, and cow's milk. eNO was collected in 1-l mylar bags (exhaled pressure 10 cmH2O, flow 58 ml/s) and analyzed by using chemiluminescence. Atopic and non-atopic children without a history of chronic respiratory symptoms had a similar geometric mean eNO (atopics, n = 28, 11.2 p.p.b.; non-atopics, n = 96, 10.0 p.p.b.; mean ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-1.6). Conversely, atopic asthmatic subjects had significantly higher eNO values than non-atopic asthmatic subjects (atopics, n = 25, 24.8 p.p.b.; non-atopics, n = 16, 11.4 p.p.b.; mean ratio 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-3.9, p= 0.000). In children with rhinitis alone (n = 15) and those with lower respiratory symptoms other than asthma (n = 33), eNO increased slightly, but not significantly, with atopy. eNO levels correlated significantly with Dpt wheal size (r = 0.51) as well with the wheal size for cat, mixed grass, and Parietaria officinalis (r = 0.30-0.29), and with the sum of all wheals (r = 0.47) (p= 0.000). Subjects sensitized only for Dpt (but not those subjects sensitized only for grass pollen or other allergens) showed significantly higher eNO levels than non-atopic subjects (16.4 p.p.b. vs. 10.2 p.p.b., mean ratio 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3, p= 0.002). In asthmatic subjects, Dpt sensitization markedly increased eNO levels (Dpt-sensitized subjects: 28.0 p.p.b.; Dpt-unsensitized subjects: 12.2 p.p.b.; mean ratio 2.3, 95% CI: 1.5-3.5, p= 0.000). Non-asthmatic Dpt-sensitized subjects also had significantly higher eNO values than non-asthmatic, non-Dpt-sensitized subjects (14.2 p.p.b. vs. 10.1 p.p.b.; mean ratio 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.9, p= 0.008). No difference was found between eNO levels in asthmatic subjects and control subjects exposed or unexposed to tobacco smoke. In conclusion, eNO concentrations are high in atopic asthmatic children and particularly high in atopic asthmatics who are sensitized to house-dust mite allergen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.