1 Endothelial dysfunction plays a role in the development of atherosclerosis and diabetes-associated vascular disease and, in the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced apoE-deficient diabetic mouse, we report that, when compared to the citrate (CIT)-treated nondiabetic apoE-deficient control, acetylcholine (Ach)-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation was reduced in the small mesenteric arteries (SMA) and the plaque-prone regions of the aorta from the STZ-diabetic mouse. 2 In the SMA the component of Ach-mediated relaxation that was attributed to nitric oxide (NO) from STZ-treated diabetic apoE-deficient mice was enhanced; however, the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF)-mediated component was reduced. The EDHF component was assessed by determining the component of the Ach-mediated response that was resistant to the combination of the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor N o -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, cyclooxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin, and soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor, ODQ, and inhibited by the combination of the intermediate conductance K Ca (IK Ca ) inhibitor TRAM-34 and the smallconductance K Ca (SK Ca ) inhibitor apamin. 3 Endothelial NOS was increased but SK2, SK3 and connexin (Cx) 37 mRNA expressions were significantly (Po0.05) decreased in the SMA from STZ-treated apoE-deficient mice compared to the CIT-treated controls. There was no difference in the IK Ca expression or in Cx 40, 43 and 45 mRNA levels between STZ-and CIT-treated mice. 4 The microvasculature of STZ-induced apoE-deficient mice developed endothelial dysfunction, which may be linked to a decrease in the contribution of the EDHF component due to a decrease in SK2 and 3 and Cx 37 expression.
IMPORTANCE: Intensive lifestyle change (e.g., the Diabetes Prevention Program) and metformin reduce type 2 diabetes risk among patients with prediabetes. However, real-world uptake remains low. Shared decision-making (SDM) may increase awareness and help patients select and follow through with informed options for diabetes prevention that are aligned with their preferences. OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a prediabetes SDM intervention. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty primary care clinics within a large regional health system. PARTICIPANTS: Overweight/obese adults with prediabetes (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m 2 and HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) were enrolled from 10 SDM intervention clinics. Propensity score matching was used to identify control patients from 10 usual care clinics. INTERVENTION: Intervention clinic patients were invited to participate in a face-to-face SDM visit with a pharmacist who used a decision aid (DA) to describe prediabetes and four possible options for diabetes prevention: DPP, DPP ± metformin, metformin only, or usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary endpoint was uptake of DPP (≥ 9 sessions), metformin, or both strategies at 4 months. Secondary endpoint was weight change (lbs.) at 12 months. RESULTS: Uptake of DPP and/or metformin was higher among SDM participants (n = 351) than controls receiving usual care (n = 1028; 38% vs. 2%, p < .001). At 12-month follow-up, adjusted weight loss (lbs.) was greater among SDM participants than controls (− 5.3 vs. − 0.2, p < .001). LIMITATIONS: Absence of DPP supplier participation data for matched patients in usual care clinics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A prediabetes SDM intervention led by pharmacists increased patient engagement in evidence-based options for diabetes prevention and was associated with significantly greater uptake of DPP and/or metformin at 4 months and weight loss at 12 months. Prediabetes SDM may be a promising approach to enhance prevention efforts among patients at increased risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at clinicaltrails.gov (NCT02384109)).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.