Purpose: To evaluate the implementation of the first statewide newborn screening (NBS) program for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in Australia. Processes that hinder and support clinical development, translation, and sustainability of the first primary genetic screening program in Australia are appraised. Methods: The study prospectively describes the course (timelines, health processes, and preliminary clinical outcomes) for SMA screen-positive newborns from 1 August 2018 to 31 July 2019 in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Results: In the first year of the program, 103,903 newborns were screened. Ten newborns screened positive for SMA. Genetic confirmation of SMA occurred in 9/10 (90%) of infants. Clinical signs of SMA evolved in 4/9 (44%) within 4 weeks of life, heralded by hypotonia and weakness initially recognized in the neck. Median time to implementing a care plan (including commencement of disease-modifying therapies) was 26.5 days (16-37 days) from birth. Conclusion: NBS is essential for early and equitable identification of patients with SMA. Expedient diagnosis and management are vital, as disease latency appears brief in some cases. NBS shows significant clinical utility to support early parental decision making, improve access to specialist neuromuscular expertise, and facilitate initiation of personalized therapeutic strategies.

Background: Current carrier screening methods do not identify a proportion of carriers that may have children affected by spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Additional genetic data is essential to inform accurate risk assessment and genetic counselling of SMA carriers. This study aims to quantify the various genotypes among parents of children with SMA. Method: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken at Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, the major SMA referral centre for New South Wales, Australia. Participants included children with genetically confirmed SMA born between 2005 and 2021. Data was collected on parent genotype inclusive of copy number of SMN1 exons 7 and 8. The number of SMN2 exon 7 copies were recorded for the affected children. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of carriers of 2+0 genotype classified as silent carriers. Chi-square test was used to correlate the association between parents with a heterozygous SMN1 exon 7 deletion and two copies of exon 8 and ≥3 SMN2 copy number in the proband. Results: SMA carrier testing was performed in 118/154 (76.6%) parents, incorporating 59 probands with homozygous SMN1 deletions and one proband with compound heterozygote pathogenic variants. Among parents with a child with SMA, 7.6% had two copies of SMN1 exon 7. When only probands with a homozygous SMN1 exon 7 deletion were included, 6.9% of parents had two copies of SMN1 exon 7. An association was observed between heterozygous deletion of SMN1 exon 7 with two copies of exon 8 in a parent and ≥3 SMN2 copy number in the affected proband (p = 0.07). Conclusions: This study confirmed a small but substantial proportion of silent carriers not identified by conventional screening within an Australian context. Accordingly, the effectiveness of carrier screening for SMA is linked with genetic counselling to enable health literacy regarding high and low risk results and is complemented by new-born screening and maintaining clinical awareness for SMA. Gene conversion events may underpin the associations between parent carrier status and proband SMN2 copy number.