Background Complementary and integrative health (CIH) is a viable solution to PTSD and chronic pain. Many veterans believe CIH can be performed only by licensed professionals in a health care setting. Health information technology can bring effective CIH to veterans and their partners. Objective This paper describes the rationale, design, and methods of the Mission Reconnect protocol to deliver mobile and Web-based complementary and integrative health programs to veterans and their partners (eg, spouse, significant other, caregiver, or family member). Methods This three-site, 4-year mixed-methods randomized controlled trial uses a wait-list control to determine the effects of mobile and Web-based CIH programs for veterans and their partners, or dyads. The study will use two arms (ie, treatment intervention arm and wait-list control arm) in a clinical sample of veterans with comorbid pain and posttraumatic stress disorder, and their partners. The study will evaluate the effectiveness and perceived value of the Mission Reconnect program in relation to physical and psychological symptoms, global health, and social outcomes. Results Funding for the study began in November 2018, and we are currently in the process of recruitment screening and data randomization for the study. Primary data collection will begin in May 2019 and continue through May 2021. Projected participants per site will be 76 partners/dyads, for a total of 456 study participants. Anticipated study results will be published in November 2022. Conclusions This work highlights innovative delivery of CIH to veterans and their partners for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03593772; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03593772 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/77Q2giwtw) International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/13666

No abstract

Introduction: Complementary and integrative health (CIH) modalities promote overall health and well-being and can be beneficial for individuals with a range of conditions. Traditionally, CIH has been delivered in person. COVID-19 created a need to identify sustainable remote delivery options to assure access to CIH while practicing public health recommendations. This scoping review maps the opportunities and challenges to remotely delivered CIH. Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted between June 2020 and October 2020 using the following search engines: PubMed, Academic Search Premier, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, and the Cochrane Clinical Trial Collections. Search results investigating remote CIH delivery were restricted to articles written in English, published after 1990. Results: Of the 10,884 articles identified, after review for content and methods, 330 articles were included. Most articles were randomized controlled trials ( n = 170), applied mindfulness ( n = 203), and targeted mental and behavioral health conditions ( n = 182). Interventions were primarily delivered through mobile applications ( n = 151) and web-based platforms ( n = 86). Most commonly reported barriers were adherence ( n = 24), resource requirements (e.g., time and space) ( n = 23), and technology-related issues ( n = 21). Although most studies did not report facilitators ( n = 217), most commonly reported facilitators were social and technologic supports, accessibility, usability, perceptions, and rewards. Participant outcomes measured were broad and included movement ( n = 88), stress ( n = 68), and pain ( n = 54). Intervention characteristic outcomes most often measured were satisfaction and usability ( n = 5). Conclusions: This scoping literature review identified many articles addressing remote delivery of CIH, but few reporting on the implementation of remotely delivered CIH. Findings suggest remotely delivered CIH, specifically mindfulness and meditation-based modalities, is a viable treatment option for a diverse range of health conditions. Feasibility studies and larger sample sizes are recommended to strengthen the scientific evidence.

The Whole Health Initiative is a redesign of health care delivery that focuses on admini stering personalized veteran health plans rather than focusing on treating disease. In 2018, Whole Health launched at 36 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities throughout the country. Flagship sites (N = 18) implemented the full Whole health system and design sites (N = 18) implemented elements of Whole Health. The project purpose was to identify efforts to improve implementation for this national initiative to improve veterans' lives. This evaluation project used a crosssectional design to obtain qualitative semistructured interview data. Rapid analysis using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Constructs (CFIR) was used to identify themes. A snowball sample of 45 staff participants from five design sites and one flagship site participated. Participants represented management and providers among other Whole Health staff. Facilities varied in the degree to which Whole Health was implemented. The provision of leadership support and resources, the need to address national policies and procedures and the need for standardized measures used to measure Whole Health outcomes were common experiences. Implementation of Whole Health to improve veterans' lives is a complex endeavor. Providers, clinicians, and leadership are engaged and motivated to implement this new delivery model at their facilities, understanding it changes the focus of their relationships with veterans from one of focusing on problems to one of collaboratively working with veterans to achieve individual health goals. Identified barriers limit implementation and expose issues such as lack of facility resources, hiring and training mechanisms, and leadership endorsement. Whole Health is a priority within the VA and the motivation and readiness of VA staff to move into a more collaborative relationship with the veterans they serve are foundational to success and longevity of the program. Our findings created an opportunity to promote sustainable outcomes for future Whole Health implementation efforts.

No abstract