Background Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated durable responses and remarkable antitumor effects in a variety of cancers. Although these agents are generally well-tolerated, patients can experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that require prompt recognition by healthcare providers. Immune-related ocular toxicities are rare, but serious adverse events have been reported with the use of checkpoint inhibitors. Case presentation: Here, we describe a rare case of panuveitis during Nivolumab and Ipilimumab combination treatment in a patient being treated for recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). The patient was managed with an injection of Ozurdex (Allergan, Madison, NJ), a dexamethasone intravitreal implant. The patient had a resolution of inflammation and an improvement in her vision and was able to resume nivolumab monotherapy without recurrence of the panuveitis. Conclusion This case highlights the importance of early recognition of ocular irAEs by ocular oncologists and the successful approach to treatment of immunotherapy-induced panuveitis in order to avoid permanent cessation of therapy.

No abstract

BackgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant challenge due to limited treatment options. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes in patients treated with standard IV therapy or oral fosfomycin for ESBL and CRE UTIs.MethodsRetrospective cohort review of inpatients diagnosed with ESBL and CRE UTIs between June 2016 and September 2017 at a seven-hospital system. Patients with polymicrobial UTI, bloodstream infections, additional anatomical site with ESBL/CRE, or those requiring renal replacement therapy were excluded. Only patients with documented fosfomycin susceptible isolates in vitro were included. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: standard IV therapy (SDTx) or fosfomycin therapy (FOS). FOS group could receive ≤72 hours of other active antibiotics from urine culture collection (UTI onset) to the first dose of fosfomycin. Quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores were calculated at UTI onset. The primary endpoint was functional cure defined as resolution of symptoms without microbiological failure. Microbiological failure was defined as a positive urine culture within the index hospitalization or 30 days.ResultsThere were 70 patients included: 31 treated with SDTx and 39 with FOS. ESBL Echerichia coli was most common, accounting for 58% of UTIs in SDTx and 71.8% in FOS. ESBLs accounted for 71% (n = 22/31) of UTIs in SDTx and 89.7% (n = 35/39) in FOS. The overall qSOFA score was 0.7 (range, 0–3) with the majority of patients scoring < 2 (80.6% in SDTx vs. 92.3% in FOS; P = 0.29). There was no significant difference in functional cure rate (n = 30, 96.8% SDTx vs. n = 37, 94.9% FOS; P = 0.83). SDTx patients had a longer length of stay (15.3 days vs. 7.3 days with FOS; P = 0.04), duration of active therapy (7.6 days vs. 3 days with FOS; P < 0.0001), and time from UTI onset to discharge (10.3 days vs. 6.6 days with FOS; P = 0.002). There were no adverse drug events reported.ConclusionOral fosfomycin was a safe and effective alternative to standard IV therapy for ESBL and CRE UTIs in this investigation and demonstrated similar functional cure rates. Additionally, patients treated with fosfomycin had shorter hospitalizations and durations of antibiotic therapy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.