In LD-SCLC treatment, TRT starting in the third cycle of chemotherapy seemed to be noninferior to early TRT, and had a more favorable profile with regard to neutropenic fever.

The treatment of choice for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) consists of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Little is known, however, regarding the comparative toxicity and efficacy of various HDC regimens applied in NHL. We have retrospectively evaluated the clinical aspects of the BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide (BEAC) and BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) regimens for ASCT. Between April 1994 and February 2005, 97 NHL patients underwent HDC with BEAC (N = 69) or BEAM (N = 28), followed by ASCT, at the Asan Medical Center. We matched each BEAM patient with two BEAC patients having the same International Prognostic Index. Thus, 84 patients (56 BEAC and 28 BEAM) were analyzed. Median age was 40.5 years, and baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The median time to neutrophil engraftment (>500/mm(3)) was significantly longer with BEAC than with BEAM (12 vs 11 days, P = 0.001), as was the total amount of red blood cell transfusion (6.5 vs 3.7U, P = 0.037), but the median time to platelet engraftment (>20,000/mm(3)) and the total amount of platelet transfusion did not differ between the two groups. BEAM patients had significantly more frequent World Health Organization grade greater than or equal to 2 diarrhea than BEAC patients (46.4 vs 19.6%, P = 0.010), but the incidence of mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and bleeding and the number of episodes of febrile neutropenia and septicemia did not differ between the two groups. Median follow-up for survivors was 33 months in the BEAM group and 89 months in the BEAC group. Median overall survival and median event-free survival were not reached in the BEAM group and were 7.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1-14.8 months, P = 0.003) and 3.7 months (95% CI, 0.1-7.2 months, P = 0.001), respectively, in the BEAC group. BEAM appeared to be superior to BEAC for survival. Regimen-related toxicities were similar, except that BEAM was associated with more frequent but acceptable diarrhea.

Dasatinib and radotinib are oral BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors that were developed as drugs for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. We report here that the c-KIT (CD117) targeting with dasatinib and radotinib promotes acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell death, and c-KIT endocytosis is essential for triggering c-KIT-positive AML cell death by dasatinib and radotinib during the early stages. In addition, dasatinib and radotinib reduce heat shock protein 90β (HSP90β) expression and release Apaf-1 in c-KIT-positive AML cells. Finally, this activates a caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway in c-KIT-positive AML cells. Moreover, the inhibition of c-KIT endocytosis by dynamin inhibitor (DY) reversed cell viability and c-KIT expression by dasatinib and radotinib. HSP90β expression was recovered by DY in c-KIT-positive AML cells as well. Furthermore, the effect of radotinib on c-KIT and HSP90β showed the same pattern in a xenograft animal model using HEL92.1.7 cells. Therefore, dasatinib and radotinib promote AML cell death by targeting c-KIT. Taken together, these results indicate that dasatinib and radotinib treatment have a potential role in anti-leukemic therapy on c-KIT-positive AML cells.