No abstract

The present study examines how gamma oscillations can be modulated by cognitive reappraisal. Thirty-two participants performed cognitive reappraisal tasks to increase or decrease their emotions while viewing neutral and emotional (positive or negative) pictures. As a control task, the participants also simply viewed the pictures without an attempt to manipulate emotions. Electroencephalograms of the participants were recorded during the cognitive reappraisal tasks to extract the gamma oscillations. Gamma activity was quantified by measuring event-related changes in the gamma band power (30-55 Hz). During the tasks, the greatest gamma activity was found at the parietal regions. Greater parietal gamma activity was induced by the emotional pictures compared with the neutral ones when the participants passively viewed the pictures. No such difference in the parietal gamma activity was found when the participants performed the cognitive reappraisal tasks. In addition, parietal gamma activity during the cognitive reappraisal tasks was greater than that during the control task in response to the neutral pictures, implying the role of parietal gamma activity in the top-down cognitive execution process. In contrast, parietal gamma activity during the cognitive reappraisal task to increase emotions was greater than the levels of activity during the task to decrease emotions and during the control task in response to the emotional pictures, implying the role of parietal gamma activity in the bottom-up sensory emotional process. These results suggest that parietal gamma activity may be implicated in the multiple cognitive reappraisal processes.

No abstract

Table of contentsA1 Functional advantages of cell-type heterogeneity in neural circuitsTatyana O. SharpeeA2 Mesoscopic modeling of propagating waves in visual cortexAlain DestexheA3 Dynamics and biomarkers of mental disordersMitsuo KawatoF1 Precise recruitment of spiking output at theta frequencies requires dendritic h-channels in multi-compartment models of oriens-lacunosum/moleculare hippocampal interneuronsVladislav Sekulić, Frances K. SkinnerF2 Kernel methods in reconstruction of current sources from extracellular potentials for single cells and the whole brainsDaniel K. Wójcik, Chaitanya Chintaluri, Dorottya Cserpán, Zoltán SomogyváriF3 The synchronized periods depend on intracellular transcriptional repression mechanisms in circadian clocks.Jae Kyoung Kim, Zachary P. Kilpatrick, Matthew R. Bennett, Kresimir JosićO1 Assessing irregularity and coordination of spiking-bursting rhythms in central pattern generatorsIrene Elices, David Arroyo, Rafael Levi, Francisco B. Rodriguez, Pablo VaronaO2 Regulation of top-down processing by cortically-projecting parvalbumin positive neurons in basal forebrainEunjin Hwang, Bowon Kim, Hio-Been Han, Tae Kim, James T. McKenna, Ritchie E. Brown, Robert W. McCarley, Jee Hyun ChoiO3 Modeling auditory stream segregation, build-up and bistabilityJames Rankin, Pamela Osborn Popp, John RinzelO4 Strong competition between tonotopic neural ensembles explains pitch-related dynamics of auditory cortex evoked fieldsAlejandro Tabas, André Rupp, Emili Balaguer-BallesterO5 A simple model of retinal response to multi-electrode stimulationMatias I. Maturana, David B. Grayden, Shaun L. Cloherty, Tatiana Kameneva, Michael R. Ibbotson, Hamish MeffinO6 Noise correlations in V4 area correlate with behavioral performance in visual discrimination taskVeronika Koren, Timm Lochmann, Valentin Dragoi, Klaus ObermayerO7 Input-location dependent gain modulation in cerebellar nucleus neuronsMaria Psarrou, Maria Schilstra, Neil Davey, Benjamin Torben-Nielsen, Volker SteuberO8 Analytic solution of cable energy function for cortical axons and dendritesHuiwen Ju, Jiao Yu, Michael L. Hines, Liang Chen, Yuguo YuO9 C. elegans interactome: interactive visualization of Caenorhabditis elegans worm neuronal networkJimin Kim, Will Leahy, Eli ShlizermanO10 Is the model any good? Objective criteria for computational neuroscience model selectionJustas Birgiolas, Richard C. Gerkin, Sharon M. CrookO11 Cooperation and competition of gamma oscillation mechanismsAtthaphon Viriyopase, Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer, Stan GielenO12 A discrete structure of the brain wavesYuri Dabaghian, Justin DeVito, Luca PerottiO13 Direction-specific silencing of the Drosophila gaze stabilization systemAnmo J. Kim, Lisa M. Fenk, Cheng Lyu, Gaby MaimonO14 What does the fruit fly think about values? A model of olfactory associative learningChang Zhao, Yves Widmer, Simon Sprecher,Walter SennO15 Effects of ionic diffusion on power spectra of local field potentials (LFP)Geir Halnes, Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen, Daniel Keller, Klas H. Pettersen,Ole A. Andreassen...

Facial preference that results from the processing of facial information plays an important role in social interactions as well as the selection of a mate, friend, candidate, or favorite actor. However, it still remains elusive which brain regions are implicated in the neural mechanisms underlying facial preference, and how neural activities in these regions are modulated during the formation of facial preference. In the present study, we investigated the modulation of electroencephalography (EEG) oscillatory power with facial preference. For the reliable assessments of facial preference, we designed a series of passive viewing and active choice tasks. In the former task, twenty-four face stimuli were passively viewed by participants for multiple times in random order. In the latter task, the same stimuli were then evaluated by participants for their facial preference judgments. In both tasks, significant differences between the preferred and non-preferred faces groups were found in alpha band power (8–13 Hz) but not in other frequency bands. The preferred faces generated more decreases in alpha power. During the passive viewing task, significant differences in alpha power between the preferred and non-preferred face groups were observed at the left frontal regions in the early (0.15–0.4 s) period during the 1-s presentation. By contrast, during the active choice task when participants consecutively watched the first and second face for 1 s and then selected the preferred one, an alpha power difference was found for the late (0.65–0.8 s) period over the whole brain during the first face presentation and over the posterior regions during the second face presentation. These results demonstrate that the modulation of alpha activity by facial preference is a top-down process, which requires additional cognitive resources to facilitate information processing of the preferred faces that capture more visual attention than the non-preferred faces.