Most households and workplaces all over the world possess furnishings and electronics, all of which contain potentially toxic flame retardant chemicals to prevent fire hazards. Indoor dust is a recognized repository of these types of chemicals including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and non-polybrominated diphenyl ethers (non-PBDEs). However, no previous U.S. studies have differentiated concentrations from elevated surface dust (ESD) and floor dust (FD) within and across microenvironments. We address this information gap by measuring twenty-two flame-retardant chemicals in dust on elevated surfaces (ESD; n=10) and floors (FD; n=10) from rooms on a California campus that contain various concentrations of electronic products. We hypothesized a difference in chemical concentrations in ESD and FD. Secondarily, we examined whether or not this difference persisted: (a) across the studied microenvironments and (b) in rooms with various concentrations of electronics. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated that the ESD was statistically significantly higher than FD for BDE-47 (p=0.01), BDE-99 (p=0.01), BDE-100 (p=0.01), BDE-153 (p=0.02), BDE-154 (p=0.02), and 3 non-PBDEs including EH-TBB (p=0.02), BEH-TEBP (p=0.05), and TDCIPP (p=0.03). These results suggest different levels and kinds of exposures to flame-retardant chemicals for individuals spending time in the sampled locations depending on the position of accumulated dust. Therefore, further research is needed to estimate human exposure to flame retardant chemicals based on how much time and where in the room individuals spend their time. Such sub-location estimates will likely differ from assessments that assume continuous unidimensional exposure, with implications for improved understanding of potential health impacts of flame retardant chemicals.

F ive years after legislation to establish the Green Chemistry Initiative (GCI), the landmark California Safer Consumer Products Law became effective on October 1st, 2013. 1 We argue here that the development of new regulatory policies to stimulate the convergence of materials development research and public health and environmental impact assessments provides evidence that these topics have traditionally addressed separate audiences, developed different values and measurement systems, and focused on incompatible goals. The United State's Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) provides an opportunity to use lessons learned from the California experience to reduce the temporal and scientific gaps that challenge initiatives to prevent disease and environmental pollution resulting from toxic chemicals in consumer products. The MGI aims to more rapidly meet societal needs in clean energy, national security, and human welfare by developing materials that are "at the heart of innovation, economic opportunities, and global competitiveness". 2 The MGI calls for accelerating the pace of research in computational and experimental tools, collaborative networks, and digital data processingall represent a boost for the fledgling discipline of materials informatics. Two years after MGI started, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, DoE, and the White House's Office of Science called the first "Materials Genome Initiative Grand Challenges Summit" (June 25−26, 2013). The agenda focused on five traditional materials science themes. 3 The articulated MGI goals are laudable, but a crucial

Human exposure to flame retardants occurs in microenvironments due to their ubiquitous presence in consumer products and building materials. Recent research suggests higher levels of exposure through elevated surface dust (ESD) compared to floor dust (FD). However, it is unclear whether this pattern is consistent in different microenvironments beyond the home. We hypothesized that time spent in various microenvironments will significantly modify the pattern of human exposure to flame retardant chemicals in ESD and FD. We tested this hypothesis by collecting time activity diaries from 43 participants; and by estimating human exposure to 10 polybrominated diphenyl ether and 8 non-polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardant chemicals, based on chemical concentrations measured in different microenvironments visited by the participants. The results of paired t-tests show that, with some notable exceptions, estimates of human exposure to most chemicals through ESD are statistically significantly higher for ∑PBDE (p=0.00) and ∑non-PBDEs (p=0.00) than through FD. This study reinforces the need to integrate temporal, locational, and elevation dimensions in assessing human exposure to potentially toxic flame retardant chemicals.