SummaryBackground: After implementation of a system-wide EMR within our university system, e-prescribing is now commonplace. Objective: The authors conducted a study to assess whether optimization of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) can reduce errors in these electronically transmitted prescriptions and would require less frequent interventions from pharmacists, in particular the need for them to "call to clarify" (CTC) details of particular prescriptions. Secondary analysis based on cost assumptions was preformed to presume cost differences before and after optimization changes. Materials and Methods:In order to generate complete, error-free prescriptions, optimization changes were implemented in the form of in line validation messages. These messages were generated if (1) an order did not specify a provider or pharmacy; (2) the DEA requirements were not met; (3) character limits were exceeded in patient sig or demographics or (4) administration instructions had breaks or had both discrete and free text elements. Retrospectively, prescriptions were randomly selected from a nine month period before and after implementing changes. These prescriptions were analyzed by a pharmacist and a nurse to identify types of errors that would require a CTC to a prescribing provider. Errors were compared statistically to determine effectiveness of changes pre and post optimization. Results: A total of 602 prescriptions were analyzed; 301 before changes and 301 after changes. Of these prescriptions, 20.27% had errors before changes and 12.96% had errors after changes. The decline in the error rate was considered statistically significant for p<0.05. The cost savings were estimated at $76 per 100 prescriptions for pharmacist and physician time-cost estimates combined. Conclusions: Implementing optimization changes to the CPOE resulted in a reduction in error rate requiring pharmacist CTC. This study identifies effective optimization changes for electronic prescribing that can reduce prescribing errors and may result in cost saving.

No abstract

have disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/ investigative use of a commercial product/device.

Background: Now a day's mental and behavioural disorders are common in the community. Globally, some 450 million persons suffer from a mental or behavioural disorder contributing to 13% of global burden of disease.1TheServices are provided by psychiatric hospitals where assessments are carried out by psychiatrists, clinical psychologists and sometimes psychiatric social workers, using various methods but often relying on observation and questioning. Even this is done in the community. Thus on the basis of these observations we have drawn the conclusion of epidemiological variants among the patients. Aims & Objective: To assess the frequency of various epidemiological trends in patients in mental hospital and to study associated risk factors in them. Material and Methods: 118 patients out of 237 in mental hospital were selected on random basis. On predesigned Performa, various details were noted and the data was analyzed in epi info 7. Results: There were 48.3% females and 51.7% males. There were 87 cases of schizophrenia and 19 case of bipolar disorder in manic phase. The 57.98% of patients present with behaviour abnormality and 43.45% of patients have the abnormal BMI and 24.25% of patients of patients have primary education level. The 81.21% of people were not working. Conclusion: Resources and service for the mental disorder are comparatively low as compared to the burden of the disease. Thus by studying the various epidemiological correlations we can plan certain preventive measures so that mental disease burden could be decrease. Looking to the etiopathology, found in our study it is recommended that counselling should also be a part of management and importance should be given to environmental or social factors like education living standards etc. for prevention of mental disorders.