<50 3269 (70.79%) First operator, n (%) Specialist 2589 (56.06%) Resident 2029 (43.94%) Median operative time, min (IQR) 55 (40-70) Technique, n (%) Clipping 2841 (61.64%) Suturing/ligature 453 (9.79%) Stapler 313 (6.75%) Endoloop 606 (13.11%) Röder loop 403 (8.71%) Complicated appendicitis, n (%) 1269 (27.48%) Uncomplicated appendicitis, n (%) 3349 (72.52%) Intraoperative adverse events, n (%) 104 (2.25%) Drainage, n (%) 3493 (75.64%) Postoperative morbidity, n (%) 310 (6.71%) Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, n (%) I 146 (3.16%) II 80 (1.73%) III 77 (1.67%) IV 4 (0.09%) V 3 (0.06%) Conversions, n (%) 294 (6.37%) Reinterventions after primary procedure, n (%) 98 (2.12%) LOS 3 (2-4) Readmissions, n (%) 118 (2.56%)

Determining the true and indisputable data regarding the vermiform appendix (VA) morphology is of a great clinical interest. The aim of this study was to provide the best evidence‐based anatomical overview of the variations in location and size of VA using a systematic and meta‐analytical approach. A systematic review with meta‐analysis was performed of studies reporting variants of the location and morphometric data regarding the VA. The MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched throughout June 2018. The reported locations of the body of the VA were re‐classified into a new, standardized classification system divided into nine categories. The AQUA tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. The research was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered at PROPSERO database. Our meta‐analysis included 242 studies (n = 114,080). Overall, the VA was most commonly found in the retrocecal location (32.1%, 95%CI: 29.2–35.1), followed by the pelvic (28.5%, 95%CI: 26.7–30.4) and ileal (14.5%, 95%CI: 11.8–17.7) locations. Subjects without known appendiceal pathologies had significantly smaller VA outer diameters (5.84 mm, 95%CI: 5.68–5.99) than patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis (10.64 mm, 95%CI: 10.14–11.15). The overall pooled mean length of the VA was 80.29 mm (95%CI: 76.68–83.89). Significant differences were found in size of the VA between imaging modalities. The results obtained from this evidence‐based anatomy study will improve the clinical understanding of the VA anatomy, which in turn will have major implications for clinical practice. Clin. Anat. 32:85–98, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that report outcomes concerning treatment of nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, CNKI and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes included aesthetic improvement measured using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence rates of complications occurring after the procedure. At baseline, the pooled mean WSRS score was 3.23 (95% CI: 3.20–3.26). One month after the procedure, the pooled WSRS score had reached 1.79 (95% CI: 1.74–1.83). After six months it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99–2.05) and after 12 months it was 2.46 (95% CI: 2.4–2.52). One month after the procedure, the pooled GAIS score had reached 2.21 (95% CI: 2.14–2.28). After six months, it was 2.32 (95% CI: 2.26–2.37), and after 12 months, it was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12–1.42). Overall, the pooled incidence of all complications was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46–0.7). Most common included lumpiness (43%), tenderness (41%), swelling (34%) and bruising (29%). Tissue fillers used for nasolabial fold area treatment allow achieving a satisfying and sustainable improvement. Most common complications include tenderness, lumpiness, swelling, and bruising. Level of Evidence II "This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266."

Background: The number of pancreatic resections due to cancers is increasing. While concomitant venous resections are routinely performed in specialized centers, arterial resections are still controversial.Nevertheless they are performed in patients presenting with locally advanced tumors. Our aim was to summarize currently available literature comparing peri-operative and long-term outcomes of arterial and non-arterial pancreatic resections. Methods:We included studies comparing pancreatic operations with and without concomitant arterial resection. Inclusion criteria were morbidity or mortality. Studies additionally reporting venous resections with no possibility of excluding this data during the extraction were discarded. Results:The initial search yielded 1651 records. Finally, 19 studies were included in the analysis involving 2710 patients. Arterial resection was associated with a greater risk of death(RR: 4.09; p < 0.001) and complications (RR: 1.4; p = 0.01). There were no differences in the rate of pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula rate, cardiopulmonary complications, length of hospital stay and non-R0 rate. Oncologically, patients after arterial resection were at higher risk of worse 3-year survival. Conclusion:Arterial resection in pancreatic cancer is associated with an increased risk of mortality and complications in comparison to standard non-arterial resections. Nevertheless, arterial resection may become a viable treatment for selected patients in high volume centers.

Introduction The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, which emphasizes preoperative interventions, is safely implemented in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients are additionally encouraged to achieve weight loss preoperatively. We aimed to identify factors contributing to preoperative weight loss and assess their influence on outcomes of bariatric surgery among patients under the ERAS protocol. Materials and Methods We reviewed a prospectively created database in two bariatric centers with 909 bariatric patients treated in accordance with ERAS principles. The database included demographic characteristics, factors related to the surgery or perioperative period, and short-term outcomes. Our endpoints included analyses of (1) factors potentially contributing to preoperative weight loss and (2) the influence of preoperative weight loss on short-term outcomes of bariatric treatment. Results Diabetes mellitus (p = 0.007), obstructive sleep apnea (p < 0.001), and previous surgery (p = 0.012) were identified as predictors of preoperative weight loss. Steatohepatitis (p < 0.001) and respiratory disorder (p = 0.004) decreased the chance of achieving satisfactory preoperative body mass reduction. Except for operative time, early outcomes of bariatric surgery were not influenced by preoperative weight loss. Patients who achieved preoperative weight loss were less likely to be lost to follow-up (p = 0.023). Postoperative weight loss was better in patients who could lose ≥ 5% total weight preoperatively (p = 0.009).