In men with hypercholesterolemia, lowering serum cholesterol level by a three-month simvastatin treatment is accompanied by a marked reduction of thrombin generation both at basal conditions in venous blood and after activation of hemostasis by microvascular injury. Once blood cholesterol became reduced, adding aspirin to simvastatin did not enhance dampening of thrombin formation.

Recent evidence indicates that aspirin inhibits thrombin generation in clotting blood. We noticed that this effect was less pronounced in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The aim of the study was to prove this observation. The effects of aspirin on thrombin generation were evaluated in (1) 46 healthy volunteers, 2 hours after ingestion of a single, 500-mg dose and (2) 28 survivors of myocardial infarction who took 300 mg aspirin/d for 2 weeks. In both populations, two well-matched subgroups were distinguished, using a serum cholesterol level of 6.2 mmol/L (240 mg/dL) and an LDL cholesterol level of 4.0 mmol/L (155 mg/dL) as borderline. Thrombin generation was monitored ex vivo in blood emerging from a skin microvasculature injury and additionally, in a single-dose study in vitro in recalcified plasma. Aspirin depressed thrombin generation in the group of subjects with serum cholesterol < 6.2 mmol/L and LDL cholesterol < 4.0 mmol/L but not in the group with high blood cholesterol levels. Inhibitory effects of aspirin were more pronounced after the 2-week treatment than after a single dose. There was a significant correlation between total serum cholesterol or LDL cholesterol and total amount of thrombin generated after aspirin treatment. In subjects with high blood cholesterol levels, thrombin generation was not affected by aspirin. Blunting of aspirin action in hypercholesterolemia might be explained by (1) alterations in platelet lipid-protein matrix that render their membrane proteins less accessible for acetylation by aspirin and (2) changes in composition and structure of plasma lipoproteins that diminish the chance of aspirin to interact with prothrombin.

The updated APS classification criteria clearly represent a step forward. However, our results argue against the use of overall positivity for aCL or anti-beta(2)GPI, and favor a clear distinction between the IgG and IgM classes of antiphospholipid ABs. Patients with both LA and anti-beta(2)GPI IgG or LA and aCL IgG positivity may represent the subgroups at the highest risk of thrombotic complications.

Summary. Objectives: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is clinically the most relevant among all antiphospholipid antibody tests. Recently, new guidelines for LA detection were published. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare tests recommended under these guidelines with other methods used for LA detection. Methods: The study group consisted of 336 subjects suffering from various autoimmune diseases. We used activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), diluted Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and diluted prothrombin time (dPT) tests for LA detection together with a ratio between sensitive and insensitive aPTT reagent. We also tested if LA was dependent on b 2 glycoprotein I (b 2 GPI) using one of the recently described methods. Results: All LA tests performed were associated with a history of thrombosis. The highest odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis was found for b 2 GPI-dependent LA but sensitivity was low (OR = 8.4; specificity/sensitivity = 98%/ 15%). All LA tests showed a much stronger association with thrombosis than with pregnancy failure. Conclusions: LA tested by aPTT and/or dRVVT (at least one out of two tests positive), as recommended by the guidelines, was associated less strongly with a history of thrombosis (OR = 4.1) than either of these tests separately (OR = 5.0 and 4.3, respectively). With both tests positive (Ôdouble LA positivityÕ) the association with thrombosis was stronger (OR = 6.5) compared with only one positive test. In fact, Ôdouble LA positivityÕ, detected by combinations of any of the tests studied, was markedly associated with a history of thrombosis.

Aim of the study One of the critical steps in molecular oncology diagnostics is obtaining high quality genomic DNA. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the techniques used to extract DNA from tissue samples. Since formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are routinely used for both retrospective and prospective studies, we compared three commercially available methods of nucleic acid extraction in terms of quantity and quality of isolated DNA. Material and methods Slides prepared from 42 FFPE blocks were macro-dissected. Resulting material was divided and processed simultaneously using three extraction kits: QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN), Cobas DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Roche Molecular Systems) and Maxwell 16 FFPE Plus LEV DNA Purification Kit (Promega). Subsequently, quantity and quality of obtained DNA samples were analysed spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific). Results of quantitative analysis were confirmed by a fluorometric procedure (Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer, Life Technologies). Results The results demonstrated that the yields of total DNA extracted using either Maxwell or Cobas methods were significantly higher compared to the QIAamp method ( p < 0.001). The Maxwell Extraction Kit delivered DNA samples of the highest quality ( p < 0.01). However, the highest total yield of extracted DNA was achieved with the Cobas technique, which may be due to a higher volume of eluate compared to the Maxwell method. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first paper which directly compares three extraction methods: Cobas, Maxwell and QIAamp. The data herein provide information required for the selection of a protocol that best suits the needs of the overall study design in terms of the quantity and quality of the extracted DNA.