Introduction Virtual reality (VR) is emerging as a new technology in the healthcare sector. It has been shown to enhance the patient’s experience and satisfaction in various settings. This review aims to give a brief description of the use of VR and establish validity of its applications to improve the patient’s pathway through surgery. Methods A literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Embase™ databases to identify fields in which VR technology has been trialled in relation to surgery. The search terms ‘virtual reality’ and ‘surgery’ were employed. Results Although benefits relating to VR use have been identified in mental health, obesity management, and physical and cognitive rehabilitation, those in surgery have been less well documented. There are, however, some important but limited benefits reported in managing surgery related stress and improving preoperative patient education as well as VR being an adjunct to some level of postoperative analgesia. Conclusions The current applications of VR in relation to surgical care fall into four main categories: preoperative education, supporting mental health, postoperative pain management, and pre and postoperative patient optimisation. Future studies and validation of VR applications should be carried out so the technology can be utilised throughout the entire patient pathway as VR surgical care bundles.

Background/Aims A tissue diagnosis is not always obtained prior to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and a proportion of patients are found to have noncancerous histology postoperatively. It is unknown if these patients have different outcomes when compared with those who have malignancy confirmed. Methods A retrospective paired case matched control study was undertaken. Patients who underwent PD for suspected malignancy but ultimately had nonmalignant histology were identified. Each was matched to a confirmed malignant control using the following criteria: age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, neoadjuvant treatment, preoperative serum bilirubin, preoperative biliary stenting and type of pancreatic anastomosis. Matching was blinded to the measured outcomes, which included perioperative morbidity and mortality. Results Forty-five cases were compared with 45 well-matched controls. There was no difference in 30- or 90-day mortality, or length of stay. While overall morbidity rates were the same, patients with nonmalignant disease were more likely to experience major (Clavien–Dindo grade III–IV) morbidity (40.0% versus 17.8%, p = 0.0352). Independently, rates of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) were higher in the nonmalignant group (22.2% versus 4.44%, p = 0.0131). Conclusions In our study, PD patients with nonmalignant histology had significantly higher incidence of major morbidity and CR-POPF when compared with those who had malignancy confirmed. This should be considered when planning the management of patients with known or presumed benign/premalignant disease.

While bariatric surgery is regarded as the most effective treatment for people with severe and morbid obesity, its pathway is regarded as a complex one due to the multidisciplinary approaches required from presurgery education until long-term management. This is essential to maintain weight loss and improve the quality of life after bariatric surgery. Although these approaches are broadened, patient education, preoperative preparation, behavioural therapy, rehabilitation, and dietary changes are regarded as the main domains in such complex care. With the increase in technological adaptation in medical services, virtual reality (VR) has shown many benefits that can be utilized in the care of bariatric patients undergoing surgery. However, VR has not been innovated to be a multidomain care package in which bariatric patients could benefit throughout their journey from the pre-operative optimization, recovery, and long-term followup. This review aims to give a brief description of some of the applications of VR technology and question whether it has the potential to be considered as a virtual ecosystem to improve the bariatric patients' experience and pathway throughout surgery and follow-up.

No abstract