Two dissimilar hemodynamic hypotheses, the "backward flow" theory and the "forward flow" theory, have been advanced to define splanchnic hemodynamics in portal hypertension. An animal model with portal hypertension and high-grade portal-systemic shunting, the portal vein-stenotic rat, was studied to determine whether a hemodynamic picture compatible with either theory would develop. Splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics and portal-systemic shunting were measured by radioactive microsphere techniques. The portal-hypertensive rats (portal pressure, 12.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.3 +/- 0.4 mmHg) with greater than 95% portal-systemic shunting had a 60% increase in portal venous inflow (23.46 +/- 2.54 vs. 14.97 +/- 1.61 ml/min; P less than 0.01) with a concomitant 50% decrease in splanchnic arteriolar resistance (3.86 +/- 0.43 vs. 7.60 +/- 0.80 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(5); P less than 0.001) compared with control rats. Cardiac index (391 +/- 17 vs. 250 +/- 20 ml . min-1 . kg-1) was elevated 50% (P less than 0.001), and total peripheral resistance (7.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 11.7 +/- 0.8 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(4)) was decreased 60% (P less than 0.001). The resistance to portal blood flow in portal vein-stenotic rats (4.77 +/- 0.57 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(4)) was similar to the resistance to portal blood flow in control rats (4.82 +/- 0.43 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(4)), indicating that the hyperdynamic portal venous inflow, not resistance, provided the main impetus for maintaining the elevated portal venous pressure. The splanchnic hemodynamic observations directly support the forward flow theory of portal hypertension. The relation between splanchnic arteriolar resistance and total peripheral resistance (r = 0.67; P less than 0.01) indicated that the systemic hemodynamic parameters were secondarily altered by the splanchnic hemodynamic changes. This animal model of chronic portal hypertension gave evidence for a generalized splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation occurring in the presence of high-grade portal-systemic shunting.
Background & Aims The interferon-free regimen of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir was recommended by professional guidelines for certain patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection based on the findings of a phase 2 trial. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen in clinical practice settings in North America. Methods We collected demographic, clinical, and virologic data, as well as reports of adverse outcomes, from sequential participants in HCV-TARGET—a prospective, observational cohort study of patients undergoing HCV treatment in routine clinical care settings. From January through October 2014, 836 patients with HCV genotype 1 infection began 12 weeks of treatment with simeprevir plus sofosbuvir (treatment duration of up to 16 weeks); 169 of these patients received ribavirin. Most patients were male (61%), Caucasian (76%), or black (13%); 59% had cirrhosis. Most had failed prior treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin without (46%) or with telaprevir or boceprevir (12%). The primary outcome was sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as level of HCV RNA below quantification at least 64 days after the end of treatment (beginning of week 12 after treatment—a 2 week window). Logistic regression models with inverse probability weights were constructed to adjust for baseline covariates and potential selection bias. Results The overall rate of SVR rate was 84% (675/802 patients, 95% CI: 81–87%). Model-adjusted estimates indicate patients with cirrhosis, prior decompensation, and previous protease inhibitor treatments were less likely to achieve an SVR. The addition of ribavirin had no detectable effects on SVR. The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, nausea, rash, and insomnia. Serious adverse events and treatment discontinuation occurred in only 5% and 3% of participants, respectively. Conclusions In a large, prospective observational cohort study, a 12 week regimen of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir was associated with high rates of SVR and infrequent treatment discontinuation. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01474811
This study was designed to investigate whether the addition of nitroglycerin to vasopressin infusion could avoid the deleterious systemic effects of vasopressin while maintaining or enhancing the therapeutic benefits of portal pressure reduction. The effect of nitroglycerin on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics was studied in cirrhotic patients and portal hypertensive dogs receiving i.v. vasopressin. During i.v vasopressin infusion (0.4 units per min), the cardiac output decreased in patients by 14% from 7.6 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- S.E.) to 6.5 +/- 0.7 liters per min, p less than 0.01, the mean arterial pressure increased 21% from 87 +/- 2 to 105 +/- 4, p less than 0.01, and the heart rate decreased 11% from 79 +/- 3 to 71 +/- 3, p less than 0.01. The administration of sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 mg) returned all the systemic hemodynamic parameters to baseline values. In dogs, vasopressin infusion significantly reduced portal pressure and flow while increasing portal venous resistance. Nitroglycerin when added to the vasopressin infusion reduced portal venous resistance and further decreased portal pressure in dogs. In patients, vasopressin reduced the hepatic blood flow (44%), wedged hepatic venous pressure (11%), and the gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressures (23%). Nitroglycerin administration caused a further reduction of the wedged hepatic venous pressure (23.6 +/- 2.3 to 21.1 +/- 2.0, 11%, p less than 0.01). There was a small but not significant further decline (7%) in the hepatic venous pressure gradient. These results provide evidence that the addition of nitroglycerin to an i.v. infusion of vasopressin reversed the detrimental effects of vasopressin while preserving the beneficial effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.